Log inSign up

Vi må vente lengre, for bussen kommer sent.

Vi må vente lengre, for bussen kommer sent.
We have to wait longer, because the bus arrives late.
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Norwegian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Norwegian now

Questions & Answers about Vi må vente lengre, for bussen kommer sent.

Why does it say Vi må—what does må do here?

Må is the present tense of å måtte and means must / have to / need to.
So Vi må vente = We have to wait (a necessity, not a preference).

Is vente an infinitive? Why isn’t it venter?

Yes—vente is the infinitive of å vente (to wait).
After modal verbs like må, kan, vil, skal, bør, Norwegian uses the infinitive (without å) rather than a conjugated verb:

  • Vi må vente (not vi må venter)
What’s the difference between lengre and lenger?

Both can mean longer here, and many learners meet both forms.

  • lengre is the comparative form related to the adjective lang (long) and is common in writing.
  • lenger is very common as an adverb meaning for a longer time / farther.

In everyday Bokmål, Vi må vente lenger is extremely common, but lengre is also accepted in many contexts. (Some style guides prefer lenger for time/distance as an adverb.)

Why is there a comma before for?

Here for introduces a clause giving a reason, similar to because. It connects two complete clauses:

  • Vi må vente lengre, (clause 1)
  • for bussen kommer sent. (clause 2)

In Norwegian, it’s standard to use a comma when linking two independent clauses like this.

What’s the difference between for and fordi (both meaning “because”)?

They often overlap, but the feel and structure differ:

  • for = “because/for” as an explanation added after a main statement; it often sounds a bit more “afterthought/explanatory.”
  • fordi = the more direct, neutral because.

Both are possible here:

  • Vi må vente lengre, for bussen kommer sent.
  • Vi må vente lengre fordi bussen kommer sent.
Why is the word order for bussen kommer sent and not verb-second like for kommer bussen sent?

In this sentence, for behaves like a coordinating connector, and the clause after it keeps normal main-clause order (subject before verb):

  • bussen (subject) + kommer (verb) + sent

You do not invert the verb after for the way you do after some fronted elements in a main clause.

What does bussen mean exactly—why not just buss?

Bussen is the bus (definite form). Norwegian often attaches the as a suffix:

  • en buss = a bus
  • bussen = the bus

Here it’s a specific bus both speaker and listener know about.

Why is kommer in the present tense if the bus is “late” right now?

Norwegian commonly uses the present tense to describe what is happening now or what is expected to happen imminently:

  • bussen kommer sent = “the bus is arriving late / will arrive late (as expected)”

It can describe an ongoing situation or a near-future arrival.

How does kommer sent differ from saying er forsinket?

They’re close, but not identical:

  • kommer sent focuses on the arrival being late (“arrives late”).
  • er forsinket states the bus is delayed (status).

Both work in many situations:

  • Bussen kommer sent i dag.
  • Bussen er forsinket.
Is sent the same as “sent” in English (like “I sent an email”)?

No. Norwegian sent means late (time-related).
English “sent” (past of “send”) is unrelated.

Can I also say seint instead of sent?

Yes. sent and seint both mean late.
In Bokmål, sent is very common in writing; seint is also used and often feels more colloquial/dialectal, depending on region and style.

Could the sentence be phrased with Vi omitted, like in English “Have to wait longer…”?

Usually you keep the subject in Norwegian. English can drop it informally, but Norwegian generally doesn’t:

  • Natural: Vi må vente lengre.
  • Dropping vi would sound incomplete unless it’s in a note/telegraph style or special context.