Questions & Answers about Politiet finner drapsmannen.
Why does politiet mean the police when it looks singular?
In Norwegian, politiet is the definite form of politi. Grammatically, it looks like a singular neuter noun, but in meaning it often refers to the police as an institution or body of officers.
So:
- politi = police
- politiet = the police
This is different from English, where the police is always treated as plural. In Norwegian, the noun itself does not have to look plural to carry that meaning.
Why is there no separate word for the?
Norwegian usually puts definiteness at the end of the noun instead of using a separate article the way English does.
Here:
- politiet = politi
- -et = the police
- drapsmannen = drapsmann
- -en = the murderer
So the endings -et and -en are doing the job that English the does.
Why does one noun end in -et and the other in -en?
Because they belong to different grammatical genders.
- politi is a neuter noun, so its definite singular form is politiet
- drapsmann is a masculine noun, so its definite singular form is drapsmannen
Very roughly:
- neuter nouns often take -et in the definite singular
- masculine nouns often take -en in the definite singular
What tense is finner?
Finner is the present tense of å finne = to find.
So:
- å finne = to find
- finner = find / finds / is finding
In Norwegian, the present tense often covers both:
- finds
- is finding
The exact English translation depends on context.
Why is the verb finner the same no matter who does the action?
Because Norwegian verbs do not change according to the subject the way English verbs do.
In English:
- I find
- you find
- he finds
In Norwegian, it stays the same:
- jeg finner
- du finner
- han finner
- politiet finner
So finner works for all persons in the present tense.
Is the word order anything special here?
This is the normal Norwegian main-clause word order:
Subject + Verb + Object
So:
- Politiet = subject
- finner = verb
- drapsmannen = object
This is very similar to basic English word order:
- The police / find / the murderer
Why is drapsmannen written as one word?
Because Norwegian makes compound nouns very freely, and they are normally written as one word.
Here:
- drap = killing / homicide
- mann = man
- drapsmann = killer / murderer
- drapsmannen = the murderer
The -s- in the middle is a common linking sound/letter in compounds. It does not usually need to be translated directly; it just helps form the compound.
Does drapsmannen specifically mean a male murderer?
Usually, yes. Drapsmann literally contains mann, so it normally refers to a male perpetrator.
If you want a more general word for murderer, Norwegian often uses morderen = the murderer.
So:
- drapsmannen = the male murderer / the killer
- morderen = the murderer, often more general
In many contexts, both can work, but drapsmannen tends to sound more specifically male.
Could politiet mean one police officer?
Normally, no. Politiet usually refers to the police as a whole, not a single officer.
If you want to talk about one officer, Norwegian would usually use a different noun, such as:
- en politibetjent = a police officer
- en politimann = a policeman
So in this sentence, politiet is best understood as the police.
How would I make this sentence negative?
You add ikke after the finite verb in a normal main clause:
Politiet finner ikke drapsmannen.
That means The police do not find the murderer.
This placement is very common in Norwegian:
- subject + verb + ikke
- rest
Can finner also mean is finding, not just finds?
Yes. Norwegian usually does not have a separate everyday verb form for the English progressive is finding.
So Politiet finner drapsmannen could, depending on context, correspond to:
- The police find the murderer
- The police are finding the murderer
In practice, though, English would more naturally translate this sentence as The police find the murderer or The police have found the murderer, depending on the wider context.
Why don’t we need den before drapsmannen?
Because a simple definite noun usually does not take a separate definite article before it.
So you say:
- drapsmannen = the murderer
not normally:
- den drapsmannen
However, if there is an adjective, Norwegian often uses both a separate article and a definite ending:
- den farlige drapsmannen = the dangerous murderer
So in your sentence, drapsmannen by itself is completely correct.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning NorwegianMaster Norwegian — from Politiet finner drapsmannen to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions