Breakdown of Puer veritatem matri dicere conatur, sed timet.
Questions & Answers about Puer veritatem matri dicere conatur, sed timet.
Why is puer in the nominative case?
Because puer is the subject of the sentence: the boy is the one doing the actions.
- puer = the boy
- Nominative is the case typically used for the subject of a finite verb in Latin.
Here, the boy both tries and fears, so puer is the subject of both verbs.
Why is veritatem in the accusative case?
Because veritatem is the direct object of dicere.
The verb dicere means to say/tell, and the thing being said is put in the accusative:
- veritas = truth
- veritatem = truth, as the direct object
So veritatem dicere means to tell the truth or more literally to say the truth.
Why is matri in the dative case?
Because matri is the indirect object: it tells you to whom the truth is being told.
- mater = mother
- matri = to/for the mother
Latin often uses the dative for the person receiving something, including speech:
- veritatem matri dicere = to tell the truth to his mother
Why is the verb dicere in the infinitive form instead of a normal finite verb?
Because it depends on conatur.
The verb conor, conari, conatus sum means to try, and in Latin it is commonly followed by an infinitive to show what someone is trying to do.
So:
- conatur = he tries
- dicere = to say / to tell
Together:
- dicere conatur = he tries to tell
This is very similar to English tries to tell.
What is special about conatur?
Conatur comes from conor, which is a deponent verb.
A deponent verb:
- looks passive in form
- but has an active meaning
So although conatur has a passive-looking ending, it means:
- he tries, not he is tried
This is a very common thing for Latin learners to notice and ask about.
Why does the sentence use timet instead of repeating puer?
Latin often leaves out the subject when it is clear from context.
Since conatur and timet are both third person singular, and puer has already been stated, Latin does not need to repeat puer.
So:
- Puer ... conatur, sed timet.
- literally: The boy ... tries, but fears.
- naturally: The boy tries ..., but he is afraid.
The subject he is understood.
Does timet mean he fears or he is afraid?
It can be understood either way depending on the context.
Literally, timet means:
- he fears
But in smoother English it is often translated as:
- he is afraid
Since no direct object is expressed here, English often prefers he is afraid.
Why is there no word for his in to his mother?
Latin often leaves out possessive words like his, her, or their when the meaning is obvious from context.
So matri by itself means to the mother, but in context English may naturally translate it as:
- to his mother
because we assume the boy is trying to tell the truth to his mother.
Latin does not always state that explicitly.
Why is the word order different from normal English word order?
Latin has freer word order than English because grammatical endings show each word’s role.
English depends heavily on word order:
- The boy tells the truth to his mother
Latin can move words around more easily because the endings tell us who is doing what:
- puer = subject
- veritatem = direct object
- matri = indirect object
So Puer veritatem matri dicere conatur is perfectly normal Latin, even though the order is not exactly English-like.
Could the words be arranged differently and still mean the same thing?
Yes, often they could.
For example, these would still mean basically the same thing:
- Puer matri veritatem dicere conatur, sed timet.
- Veritatem puer matri dicere conatur, sed timet.
The emphasis may shift slightly depending on word placement, but the case endings keep the grammar clear.
Latin word order is flexible, though not random.
Why is there no article like the or a in Latin?
Classical Latin does not have articles like English the and a/an.
So puer can mean:
- the boy
- a boy
Context tells you which is best.
Likewise:
- veritatem = the truth
- matri = to the mother
In this sentence, English naturally uses the boy and the truth.
How do we know both verbs are present tense?
From their endings and dictionary forms:
- conatur = present tense, he tries
- timet = present tense, he fears / is afraid
So the sentence describes what is happening now or generally:
- The boy is trying to tell the truth to his mother, but he is afraid or
- The boy tries to tell the truth to his mother, but he is afraid
English may use either simple present or progressive present depending on style.
What is the basic structure of veritatem matri dicere?
It is:
- veritatem = the thing said
- matri = the person told
- dicere = to tell/say
So the pattern is essentially:
- [thing] [person in dative] dicere
That gives:
- veritatem matri dicere = to tell the truth to the mother
This is a useful pattern to remember with dicere.
Why does sed come before timet?
Because sed means but and introduces the contrast with the first part of the sentence.
The sentence has two parts:
- Puer veritatem matri dicere conatur = the boy tries to tell the truth to his mother
- sed timet = but he is afraid
So sed simply links the two ideas in contrast.
Is dicere better translated as to say or to tell here?
Either is possible literally, but to tell is more natural here in English.
- dicere often means to say
- but with a person in the dative, English often prefers tell
So:
- veritatem matri dicere
- literally: to say the truth to the mother
- naturally: to tell the truth to his mother
That is why many translations use tell here.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Puer veritatem matri dicere conatur, sed timet to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions