Breakdown of Servae mensas parant, ut epulae simplices sed bonae sint.
Questions & Answers about Servae mensas parant, ut epulae simplices sed bonae sint.
What case and number is servae here, and how do we know?
Here servae is nominative plural feminine, so it means the slave women / maidservants as the subject of the sentence.
A learner might notice that servae could also be:
- genitive singular: of the slave woman
- dative singular: to/for the slave woman
But the verb parant is plural (they prepare), so servae must be the plural subject.
Why is mensas in the accusative?
Because mensas is the direct object of parant.
- parant = they prepare
- What do they prepare? mensas
So Latin uses the accusative case:
- mensa = table
- mensas = tables (accusative plural)
What form is parant?
Parant is:
- 3rd person plural
- present tense
- active voice
- indicative mood
from parare = to prepare
So it means they prepare.
What does ut mean here?
Here ut introduces a purpose clause.
It means:
- so that
- in order that
So the sentence is saying that the tables are prepared for a purpose: so that the meal may be simple but good.
Why is sint used instead of sunt?
Because after ut in a purpose clause, Latin normally uses the subjunctive, not the indicative.
- sunt = they are (indicative)
- sint = they may be / be (subjunctive)
So ut epulae simplices sed bonae sint means so that the meals may be simple but good.
Why is it the present subjunctive sint?
This is because of sequence of tenses.
The main verb is parant, which is a present tense verb, so Latin normally uses the present subjunctive in the purpose clause when the action is happening at the same time or is still future from that point of view.
So:
- parant = present main verb
- sint = present subjunctive in the purpose clause
This is the normal pattern.
Why is epulae plural?
Epulae is a noun that is very often used in the plural in Latin.
It can mean things like:
- feast
- meal
- courses
- dishes
So even if English might use a singular idea like the meal, Latin may use the plural epulae.
That is why the verb and adjectives connected with it are also plural.
Why are simplices and bonae in the nominative, not the accusative?
Because they go with epulae after the verb sint, a form of esse (to be).
With to be, Latin uses predicate adjectives in the nominative, not the accusative.
So:
- epulae = nominative plural
- simplices = nominative plural
- bonae = nominative plural
They describe what the meals are, not what is being directly acted on.
Why is it bonae and not bonae or bonas?
The correct form here is bonae.
Why?
Because epulae is:
- feminine
- plural
- nominative
So the adjective bonus, bona, bonum has to agree with it:
- feminine
- plural
- nominative
That gives bonae.
It is not bonas, because bonas would be accusative plural, and here the adjective is not a direct object; it is a predicate adjective with sint.
Why is simplices the form used here?
Because simplex, simplicis is a third-declension adjective.
To agree with epulae, it must be:
- feminine
- plural
- nominative
The nominative plural masculine/feminine form is simplices.
So:
- epulae simplices = simple meals
Is the word order special here?
Latin word order is much more flexible than English word order.
This sentence has a very natural arrangement:
- Servae = subject first
- mensas = object
- parant = verb
- then the ut clause giving the purpose
So the structure is basically:
The maidservants prepare the tables, so that the meals may be simple but good.
Latin could rearrange some of these words for emphasis, but this version is straightforward and clear.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Servae mensas parant, ut epulae simplices sed bonae sint to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions