Breakdown of Hoc opus mihi grave est, sed id finire volo.
Questions & Answers about Hoc opus mihi grave est, sed id finire volo.
Why is it hoc opus and not hic opus?
Because opus is a neuter noun. The demonstrative hic, haec, hoc must agree with the noun it modifies in gender, number, and case.
- opus = neuter singular nominative
- so this work / this task = hoc opus
If the noun were masculine, you would expect hic; if feminine, haec.
What case is opus here?
Opus is nominative singular here, because it is the subject of est.
The basic structure is:
- Hoc opus = the subject
- grave = predicate adjective
- est = is
So literally the clause is something like This work is burdensome.
Why is grave used instead of gravis?
Because grave must agree with opus, which is neuter singular.
The adjective gravis, grave has these nominative singular forms:
- masculine/feminine: gravis
- neuter: grave
Since opus is neuter, Latin uses grave.
Why is mihi in the dative?
Here mihi means to me or for me. Latin often uses the dative with adjectives to show the person affected.
So:
- Hoc opus mihi grave est
= This task is მძიმე to me / burdensome for me
more naturally, This task is hard for me
This is a very common Latin pattern: something is pleasant, useful, easy, difficult, harmful, etc. to someone.
Could Latin have used me instead of mihi?
Not in this construction.
- me is accusative or ablative
- mihi is dative
Since grave est here takes a person in the dative, mihi is the correct form.
So Latin says:
- mihi grave est = it is hard for me
not
- me grave est
What exactly is id doing in the second clause?
Id is a pronoun meaning it or that. It refers back to hoc opus.
So:
- hoc opus = this task
- id = it, meaning that same task
Latin often uses a demonstrative pronoun like id where English would simply use it.
Why is it id finire volo and not just finire volo?
Latin could often omit id if the object were obvious, so finire volo would be possible in many contexts.
But id is included here to make the reference explicit:
- id = it
- finire volo = I want to finish
So id finire volo means I want to finish it.
Why is id accusative?
Because it is the direct object of finire.
Ask: finish what?
Answer: it = id
So id is in the accusative singular neuter.
Why is finire an infinitive?
Because volo is followed by an infinitive to express want to do something.
This is a standard Latin construction:
- volo ambulare = I want to walk
- volo discere = I want to learn
- volo finire = I want to finish
So in this sentence:
- id finire volo = I want to finish it
Why is volo at the end?
Latin word order is much more flexible than English word order. A verb often comes near the end of the clause, especially in straightforward prose.
So:
- id finire volo
- literally: it to finish I want
But in natural English: I want to finish it
Putting volo at the end is completely normal Latin style.
Why are both hoc and id used? Why not the same word both times?
They do different jobs.
- hoc is an adjective modifying opus: this task
- id is a pronoun standing by itself: it
So the sentence moves from naming the thing to referring back to it:
- Hoc opus = this task
- id = it
That is a very natural Latin way to write.
Is opus the same as the English word opus?
It is the same Latin word historically, but in ordinary Latin it often just means work, task, or piece of work. It does not only mean a grand artistic work.
So in this sentence, opus likely means something like:
- task
- job
- piece of work
- project
depending on context.
Is grave est a common Latin expression?
Yes. Latin often uses sum with an adjective to describe how something is for someone:
- grave est mihi = it is hard for me
- facile est mihi = it is easy for me
- utile est mihi = it is useful for me
So grave est is a very normal pattern.
Could the sentence have been written in a different word order?
Yes. Latin allows several word orders without changing the basic meaning, though the emphasis may change.
For example, you could see things like:
- Mihi hoc opus grave est, sed id finire volo.
- Hoc opus grave mihi est, sed id finire volo.
The version given is clear and natural. The first clause especially keeps a common pattern: subject + dative + predicate + verb.
What is the basic grammar of the whole sentence?
It has two clauses joined by sed:
Hoc opus mihi grave est
- hoc opus = subject
- mihi = dative, for me / to me
- grave = predicate adjective
- est = verb
sed id finire volo
- sed = but
- id = direct object, it
- finire = infinitive, to finish
- volo = I want
So the grammar is very compact, but each part has a clear role.
What form is volo?
Volo is first person singular present active indicative of velle, meaning to want.
So volo = I want.
It is an irregular verb, and some common forms are:
- volo = I want
- vis = you want
- vult = he/she/it wants
- volumus = we want
- vultis = you all want
- volunt = they want
Why is there no separate Latin word for I?
Because the ending of volo already tells you the subject is I.
In Latin, subject pronouns are often omitted unless they are needed for emphasis or contrast.
So:
- volo already means I want
If Latin added ego, it would usually be for emphasis:
- ego volo = I want
But here plain volo is enough.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Hoc opus mihi grave est, sed id finire volo to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.
- ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions