Log inSign up

Vespere pater lucernam accendit, ut filia in cubiculo legere possit.

Vespere pater lucernam accendit, ut filia in cubiculo legere possit.
In the evening father lights a lamp, so that his daughter can read in the bedroom.
FromLesson 12inHardcore Latin
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Latin grammar?”
Latin grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Latin

Master Latin — from Vespere pater lucernam accendit, ut filia in cubiculo legere possit to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Latin freeBrowse the full course

More from this lesson

navisportusNavis in portu stat.exireNoli foris exire, quia nox obscura est.Nauta navem parat ut cras e portu exeat.duocivis

Questions & Answers about Vespere pater lucernam accendit, ut filia in cubiculo legere possit.

Why does vespere mean in the evening—what case is it?

Vespere is ablative singular of vesper, vesperis (evening). Latin often uses the ablative of time when to mean at / in a particular time:

  • vespere = in the evening
    Similarly: nocte (at night), mane (in the morning).
Is pater the subject? Why isn’t it patrem?

Yes, pater is the subject and is therefore in the nominative case.

  • pater (nominative) = the father (doing the action)
  • patrem (accusative) would mean the father as a direct object, which doesn’t fit here.
Why is lucernam in the accusative?

Because lucernam is the direct object of accendit (lights).

  • accendit = he lights / kindles
  • lucernam (accusative) = a lamp (the thing being lit)
What tense is accendit, and how can it be translated?

Accendit is present indicative active, 3rd person singular, from accendere. It can be translated as:

  • (He) lights the lamp (simple present)
  • (He) is lighting the lamp (present progressive)
    Context decides which English form sounds best.
What does ut do here, and why is possit not potest?

Ut introduces a purpose clause: in order that / so that. Purpose clauses use the subjunctive, so you get possit (present subjunctive of posse) rather than potest (present indicative).

  • ut ... possit = so that ... may be able to / can
How do I know this is purpose (so that) and not result (so that)?

The main clue is context and meaning: lighting a lamp is naturally done for the purpose of enabling reading. Latin uses ut + subjunctive for both purpose and result, but here it’s clearly purpose:

  • He lights the lamp in order that she can read.
    A result clause often has signals like tam, ita, sic (so / so much) in the main clause, which are not present here.
Why is filia nominative—shouldn’t it be accusative as the person affected?

In the ut-clause, filia is the subject of possit (and of the action legere). So it stays nominative:

  • ut filia ... possit = so that the daughter can ...
    Latin doesn’t switch to accusative just because she benefits from the action.
Why is in cubiculo ablative, and what’s the rule with in?

With in, Latin uses:

  • ablative for location (in / on / at)
  • accusative for motion into (into / onto)
    So in cubiculo (ablative) means in the bedroom (location, no movement).
What kind of verb form is legere, and why isn’t it legat?

Legere is a present active infinitive from legere (to read). After verbs like posse (to be able), Latin commonly uses an infinitive to complete the meaning:

  • possit legere = can/may be able to read
    If it were legat, that would be a finite subjunctive verb and would usually require a different structure (you’d have two finite verbs competing in the same clause without the typical infinitive complement pattern of posse).
Does possit mean can or may here?

It can be translated either way depending on how literal you want to be:

  • may be able to (more literally reflects the subjunctive nuance in purpose clauses)
  • can (more natural English in many contexts)
    So: so that the daughter can read is perfectly good.
Why is the word order so different from English—does it change the meaning?

Latin word order is flexible because endings show grammatical roles. The meaning stays the same, but the order can add emphasis. Here:

  • Vespere sets the scene first (In the evening)
  • pater is introduced early as the doer
  • lucernam is placed before accendit (common object–verb pattern)
  • The ut-clause naturally follows as the purpose.
Is there any missing word for a/the (articles)? How do I know which it is?

Latin has no articles (a/an/the). You decide from context:

  • pater could be the father (specific, known) or a father (indefinite)
  • lucernam could be a lamp or the lamp
    In many textbook-style sentences like this, English usually prefers the father and the daughter, but grammatically Latin leaves it open.