Log inSign up

Duo cives in portu stant et venditorem vocant.

Duo cives in portu stant et venditorem vocant.
Two citizens stand in the harbor and call the seller.
FromLesson 12inHardcore Latin
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Latin grammar?”
Latin grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Latin

Master Latin — from Duo cives in portu stant et venditorem vocant to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Latin freeBrowse the full course

More from this lesson

navisportusNavis in portu stat.exireNoli foris exire, quia nox obscura est.Nauta navem parat ut cras e portu exeat.duocivis

Questions & Answers about Duo cives in portu stant et venditorem vocant.

Why is it duo and not duae or duos?

Duo is the nominative masculine (or masculine‑mixed) form of 2. It agrees with the noun it modifies.

  • duo cives = two citizens (where the group is understood as male or mixed)
  • If the citizens were explicitly female, you’d use duae cives (since civis can be masculine or feminine).
  • duos would be accusative masculine, used if two citizens were a direct object (not the subject).
What case is cives, and how can I tell?

Cives is nominative plural, functioning as the subject of both verbs (stant and vocant). You can tell because:

  • it matches the subject role (who is standing and calling? → the citizens)
  • civis is 3rd declension, and its nominative plural is commonly -es: civis → cives
Does cives mean “citizens” or “fellow citizens”? And is it masculine only?

Cives basically means citizens (members of a state/community). Context can sometimes make it feel like fellow citizens, but the core meaning is citizens. Grammatically, civis can be masculine or feminine, so cives can refer to men, women, or a mixed group; duo nudges the interpretation toward male/mixed.

Why is it in portu and not in portum?

Because in changes meaning depending on the case:

  • in + ablative = in/at (a place), located in → in portu = in the harbor
  • in + accusative = into (motion toward) → in portum = into the harbor
What declension is portu from, and why does it end in -u?

Portu comes from portus, portūs (4th declension).

  • portus = nominative singular
  • portū = ablative singular (often written portu without marking the long vowel)

So in portu uses the ablative singular of a 4th‑declension noun.

What tense and person is stant?

Stant is present indicative active, 3rd person plural: they stand / they are standing. It comes from stō, stāre (to stand):

  • stō (I stand)
  • stat (he/she/it stands)
  • stant (they stand)
Why does Latin use stant instead of something like sunt stantes?

Latin usually expresses “are standing” simply with the present tense of the verb: stant. A form like sunt stantes (“they are standing”) is possible but tends to be more marked/stylistic, often emphasizing the ongoing state in a particular way. The plain present (stant) is the normal choice.

Why are there two verbs (stant and vocant) but only one subject?

Because the same subject (duo cives) applies to both verbs:

  • (duo cives) stant = the two citizens stand
  • (duo cives) vocant = the two citizens call

Latin does this freely—no need to repeat the subject.

What case is venditorem, and why?

Venditorem is accusative singular, used as the direct object of vocant:

  • vocant venditorem = they call the seller

With verbs like vocāre (to call/summon), the person being called is typically in the accusative.

What dictionary form is venditorem, and what kind of noun is it?

The dictionary form is venditor, venditoris (3rd declension), meaning seller / vendor. Its accusative singular ends in -em:

  • venditor (nom. sg.)
  • venditorem (acc. sg.)
Could et be replaced by something else?

Yes. Common alternatives include:

  • -que attached to the second word: stant vocantque = they stand and call
  • atque / ac can mean and (often with a slightly tighter connection), but et is the basic neutral and.
Is the word order fixed? Could it be rearranged?

Latin word order is flexible because the endings show the grammatical roles. For example, you could also see:

  • In portu duo cives stant et venditorem vocant.
  • Duo cives venditorem vocant et in portu stant.

Changes in order can shift emphasis (what the sentence highlights), but the basic meaning remains clear from the cases and verb endings.