Breakdown of entyoukoodo ga areba, beddo no tikaku de sumaho wo zyuuden dekiru.
Questions & Answers about entyoukoodo ga areba, beddo no tikaku de sumaho wo zyuuden dekiru.
What does あれば mean here?
Why is it 延長コードがあれば and not 延長コードはあれば?
Because ある normally marks the thing that exists with が.
- 延長コードがある = there is an extension cord
So in the conditional:
- 延長コードがあれば = if there is an extension cord
Using は is possible in some contexts, but it would add contrast or a special emphasis, like as for an extension cord.... The neutral, natural form here is が.
Does ある here mean to exist or to have?
It can feel like either one in English.
Japanese often uses ある for the existence or availability of inanimate things. So:
- 延長コードがあれば can mean if there is an extension cord
- or more naturally in some situations, if you have an extension cord
The Japanese does not need to choose as strictly as English does.
What is ベッドの近く grammatically?
近く means nearby area, vicinity, or simply near.
In ベッドの近く:
- ベッド = bed
- の = links one noun to another
- 近く = vicinity / near area
So ベッドの近く literally means the area near the bed, or more naturally, near the bed.
Why is there a の after ベッド?
Why is it ベッドの近くで and not ベッドの近くに?
Because で marks the place where an action happens.
Here, the action is charging the smartphone, so:
- ベッドの近くでスマホを充電できる
- = you can charge your smartphone near the bed
A simple way to think about it:
- で = where an action takes place
- に = destination, target location, or point of existence in many cases
Since charging is an action done at that location, で is the natural choice.
Why is スマホ marked with を even though できる often uses が?
This is a very common learner question.
It is true that できる often goes with が:
- 日本語ができる = can do/speak Japanese
But here the structure is based on the verbal expression スマホを充電する:
- スマホを充電する = charge a smartphone
When this becomes potential, Japanese very often keeps the original object marker:
- スマホを充電できる = can charge a smartphone
So を is very natural here.
You may also sometimes see が with potential expressions in Japanese, but with a verb like 充電する, スマホを充電できる is a normal and natural way to say it.
Is 充電できる a single verb?
Who is the subject of the sentence? Who can charge the phone?
The subject is omitted.
Japanese often leaves out subjects when they are obvious from context. So this sentence could mean:
- I can charge my phone near the bed
- You can charge your phone near the bed
- One can charge a smartphone near the bed
The sentence focuses on the condition and the possibility, not on explicitly naming the subject.
Why is the if part at the beginning of the sentence?
Because Japanese very often puts the condition before the result:
- if X, Y
So:
- 延長コードがあれば、ベッドの近くでスマホを充電できる。
- If there is an extension cord, you can charge your smartphone near the bed.
This order is extremely natural in Japanese.
The comma after あれば just marks a pause between the condition and the main statement.
Could I use なら or と instead of ば here?
You could, but the nuance changes.
- あれば = if there is / if you have one
- neutral and very natural here
- あるなら = if there is one / if that’s the case
- あると = when/if there is one
- often sounds more general, automatic, or habitual
For a practical statement like this, あれば is a very good choice.
Is this sentence casual or polite?
It is plain style.
- 充電できる = plain
- 充電できます = polite
So a polite version would be:
- 延長コードがあれば、ベッドの近くでスマホを充電できます。
Both are correct; the choice depends on the situation.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning JapaneseMaster Japanese — from entyoukoodo ga areba, beddo no tikaku de sumaho wo zyuuden dekiru to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions