kakibera to kiriito de seikeisi, yuugake wo site, syouseisuru.

Normally, Japanese is written without spaces.

The spaces here are almost certainly added for learners to make the structure easier to see:

• かきべら と 切り糸 で
• 成形し
• 釉掛け を して
• 焼成する

In natural Japanese writing, it would usually appear as:

かきべらと切り糸で成形し、釉掛けをして、焼成する。

Here, と means and.

It connects two nouns:

• かきべら
• 切り糸

So かきべらと切り糸 means the scraper and the cutting wire.

In this sentence, と is simply making a list of the tools being used.

で marks the means/tool/method used to do something.

So:

• かきべらと切り糸で = using a scraper and a cutting wire

This is a very common use of で in Japanese:

• 箸で食べる = eat with chopsticks
• ペンで書く = write with a pen

Here, the whole noun phrase かきべらと切り糸 is treated as the set of tools, and で marks that set as the means.

Because かきべらと切り糸 is one combined list, and で applies to the whole list.

So this structure is:

• [tool A and tool B] + で

not:

• tool A + で + tool B + で

That is the normal way to say using A and B in Japanese.

成形する is a suru-verb. Its stem/connective form is 成形し.

In written or technical Japanese, this -し form is often used to connect actions in a compact, formal way:

• 成形し、釉掛けをして、焼成する。

This is similar in function to 成形して, but 成形し sounds a bit more written, procedural, and technical.

So here it means:

• shape/form it, then...

No. 成形し by itself is not the final tense-bearing form of the sentence.

It is a connecting form that links this action to the next one. The final verb 焼成する is what finishes the sentence.

So the structure is basically:

• shape it,
• do the glazing,
• fire it.

This kind of chaining is very common in Japanese procedural writing.

Because 釉掛け is being treated here as a noun + する expression:

• 釉掛けをする = to do glazing / to apply glaze

Then して is the te-form of する, used to connect to the next step:

• 釉掛けをして、焼成する
• do the glazing, and then fire

In many cases, Japanese allows both:

• 釉掛けをする
• 釉掛けする

But noun + をする is very common, especially in formal or technical styles.

Because the sentence uses two slightly different patterns.

1. 成形し and 焼成する
   These appear directly as verbs based on する.

2. 釉掛けをして
   Here, 釉掛け is treated as a noun, followed by をする.

So even though all three are related to する-type words, the writer switches between:

• verbal form directly: 成形し、焼成する
• noun + をする: 釉掛けをして

That is perfectly normal in Japanese, especially in formal or specialized writing.

して is the te-form of する.

The te-form often connects actions in sequence, similar to:

• and
• then
• after doing that

So:

• 釉掛けをして、焼成する
• apply glaze, then fire

It links the glazing step to the firing step.

Because this is a procedural/technical description, not casual conversation.

The plain non-past form 焼成する is often used in:

• manuals
• process descriptions
• technical explanations
• captions
• instructional writing

Here it does not necessarily mean simple future tense. It describes the standard procedure:

• shape it
• glaze it
• fire it

So 焼成する is the normal way to end this kind of sentence.

Yes. The order is clearly sequential.

Japanese often shows a sequence of steps by using connective forms like:

• 成形し
• 釉掛けをして
• 焼成する

So the meaning is:

1. shape/form it
2. apply glaze
3. fire it

This is not just a random list of actions; it is a process in order.

Yes. Japanese often leaves out things that are obvious from context.

In English, you would probably say something like:

• shape it
• apply glaze to it
• fire it

In the Japanese sentence, the object is omitted because the reader is expected to already know what is being worked on, such as the clay piece or pottery item.

It has a technical, instructional, process-description style.

Clues include:

• specialized vocabulary like 成形, 釉掛け, 焼成
• connective 成形し
• plain final verb 焼成する

This is the kind of Japanese you might see in:

• a pottery manual
• a museum explanation
• a craft textbook
• a manufacturing process description

It does not sound like everyday casual speech.