watasi ni totte, taapu no setuei to hiokokosi ha muzukasii.

No. In normal Japanese writing, this would usually be written without spaces:

私にとって、タープの設営と火起こしは難しい。

Spaces are often added in learning materials to make the structure easier to see.

It is read:

わたし に とって、タープ の せつえい と ひおこし は むずかしい。

Word readings:

• 私 = わたし
• にとって = にとって
• タープ = タープ
• 設営 = せつえい
• 火起こし = ひおこし
• 難しい = むずかしい

にとって means for, to, or from the point of view of.

So 私にとって means for me or as far as I’m concerned.

It shows that the judgment difficult is being made from the speaker’s perspective. The sentence is not saying these things are universally difficult for everyone; it is saying they are difficult for me.

Because にとって is especially good for expressing a personal evaluation or viewpoint.

• 私にとって、〜は難しい = As for me / from my perspective, ~ is difficult
• 私は、〜は難しい can sound awkward here because you end up with two は topics, and the focus is less clear.

Also, 私にとって has a nuance of in my case or from where I stand. That fits well with adjectives like 難しい, 大切だ, 必要だ, and so on.

Because 設営 here is being used as a noun, not as a full verb.

• タープの設営 = the setup of a tarp / setting up a tarp
• タープを設営する = to set up a tarp

In Japanese, when one noun modifies another noun, の is often used. So タープの設営 is a noun phrase meaning tarp setup or the act of setting up a tarp.

火起こし is a noun meaning fire-starting or building a fire.

It comes from:

• 火 = fire
• 起こす = to start, raise, or create

So 火起こし is the noun form for the activity. It works similarly to 設営 in this sentence: both are activity nouns.

You could also express the idea with a verb phrase, such as 火を起こすこと, but 火起こし is shorter and very natural in a camping context.

と is the standard particle for joining nouns in a complete list, like and in English.

So:

• タープの設営と火起こし = setting up a tarp and building a fire

Here it means those two activities are being treated together as the topic of the sentence.

If the speaker wanted a looser, less complete list, they might use や instead, but と is the normal choice when naming the exact items.

Because the whole phrase タープの設営と火起こし is the topic.

Japanese often marks an entire noun phrase with は:

• [XとY] は 難しい

So the structure is:

• 私にとって = for me
• タープの設営と火起こしは = as for setting up a tarp and building a fire
• 難しい = are difficult / is difficult

The は does not belong only to 火起こし. It marks the whole combined phrase.

Because Japanese does not usually mark adjectives for singular vs. plural the way English does.

難しい can describe:

• one thing
• several things
• a whole activity phrase

So タープの設営と火起こしは難しい is perfectly natural. Japanese treats the whole phrase as one topic, and 難しい describes that topic as difficult.

Yes, it is natural and clear.

That said, 設営 sounds a bit formal or technical. In casual speech, people might choose simpler camping expressions.

For example:

• 私にとって、タープを張るのと火を起こすのは難しい。
• 私はタープ張りと火起こしが苦手だ。

Nuance:

• 難しい = difficult
• 苦手だ = not good at / weak at

So the original sentence is fine, but depending on context, a more casual version may sound more conversational.