Log inSign up

Ég finn ekki verkfærin í geymslunni, svo ég bið þig að hjálpa mér.

Ég finn ekki verkfærin í geymslunni, svo ég bið þig að hjálpa mér.
I can’t find the tools in the storage room, so I ask you to help me.

Breakdown of Ég finn ekki verkfærin í geymslunni, svo ég bið þig að hjálpa mér.

ég
I
ekki
not
að
to
þig
you
í
in
svo
so
finna
to find
hjálpa
to help
mér
me
biðja
to ask
geymslan
the storage room
verkfærin
the tools
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Icelandic grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Icelandic now

Questions & Answers about Ég finn ekki verkfærin í geymslunni, svo ég bið þig að hjálpa mér.

Why is ekki placed after finn instead of before it?

In Icelandic, the negation ekki usually comes after the finite (conjugated) verb in a main clause:

  • Ég finn ekki ... = I do not find ... This is the normal V2-style placement: the verb comes early, and ekki follows it (typically before objects/adverbials).
What case is verkfærin, and why?

verkfærin is accusative plural definite of verkfæri (tool).

  • The verb finna (to find) takes a direct object in the accusative, so verkfærin appears in accusative.
  • -in marks definite plural here (the tools, not just tools in general).
Why is it í geymslunni (with -unni) and what case is that?

geymslunni is dative singular definite of geymsla (storage room). With í, Icelandic distinguishes:

  • Location (static) → dative: í geymslunni = in the storage room (where something is)
  • Movement (direction) → accusative: í geymsluna = into the storage room (motion toward)

The ending -unni is the definite dative singular form.

Why does the sentence use svo, and what does it do to the structure?

svo here works like so / therefore, linking two clauses: 1) Ég finn ekki verkfærin í geymslunni, 2) svo ég bið þig að hjálpa mér.

It introduces a consequence clause. In writing, it’s common to use a comma before it when it clearly separates two full clauses.

Why is ég repeated: Ég finn ... , svo ég bið ...? Could it be omitted?

Icelandic typically states the subject in each clause, especially in careful/neutral style:

  • ..., svo ég bið ... is fully explicit.

In some contexts (especially informal speech), you might hear ellipsis, but repeating ég is normal and clear, and it avoids ambiguity.

Why is it bið þig—what case is þig, and why not þú/þér?

þig is the accusative form of þú (you, singular). The verb biðja (to ask/request) commonly takes:

  • the person being asked in the accusative: biðja þig = ask you So:
  • þú = nominative (subject)
  • þig = accusative (object)
  • þér = dative (used with verbs/prepositions that govern dative)

Here, you are the direct object of bið.

Why does it say að hjálpa mér (infinitive with að)?

After biðja (and many other verbs), Icelandic often uses an infinitive clause introduced by að:

  • biðja [someone] að [do something] So að hjálpa is an infinitive meaning to help, and að is the marker introducing that infinitive clause.
Should there be an um: bið þig um að hjálpa mér?

Both patterns are used, but many speakers consider biðja einhvern um að ... especially common/idiomatic:

  • Ég bið þig um að hjálpa mér.

Your sentence Ég bið þig að hjálpa mér is also heard and understood, but if you want the safest, most widely accepted phrasing, add um.

Why is it hjálpa mér and not hjálpa mig?

Because hjálpa governs the dative for the person receiving help:

  • hjálpa mér (dative) = help me Not mig (accusative).

So the pronoun changes:

  • ég (nom) → mig (acc) → mér (dat)

Here, mér is required by hjálpa.

Can you break down the verb forms finn and bið?

Yes:

  • finn = 1st person singular present of finna (to find)
  • bið = 1st person singular present of biðja (to ask/request)

Both agree with Ég (I). Icelandic verbs conjugate for person/number, so the ending (or stem change) signals I even though the subject is still usually written.