Breakdown of Bótakrafan er samþykkt að því gefnu að fylgiskjalið komi.
Questions & Answers about Bótakrafan er samþykkt að því gefnu að fylgiskjalið komi.
What does bótakrafan mean grammatically? How is that word built?
Bótakrafan is a compound noun:
- bóta- = compensation / damages
- krafa = claim, demand
- -n = the suffixed definite article, so the
So bótakrafan means the compensation claim or the claim for damages.
As a whole in this sentence, it is the subject of er samþykkt.
Why does Icelandic put the at the end in bótakrafan and fylgiskjalið?
In Icelandic, the definite article is usually attached to the noun as a suffix instead of being a separate word like English the.
So:
- bótakrafa = a compensation claim
- bótakrafan = the compensation claim
and
- fylgiskjal = an attachment / supporting document
- fylgiskjalið = the attachment / the supporting document
This is completely normal in Icelandic.
Is samþykkt a verb or an adjective here?
It is best understood as a past participle used predicatively with er.
So:
- er samþykkt = is approved
This works a lot like English is approved.
The participle samþykkt agrees with the subject. Since bótakrafan is feminine singular, samþykkt is in the matching form.
What does að því gefnu að mean?
It is a fixed, fairly formal expression meaning:
- provided that
- on condition that
- assuming that
So the sentence means that the approval is conditional.
This phrase is common in formal, administrative, and legal language.
Why are there two að words in að því gefnu að?
Because the whole expression is built in two parts:
- að því gefnu = literally something like given that
- the second að introduces the clause that follows
So:
- að því gefnu að fylgiskjalið komi = provided that the attachment arrives / is submitted
To an English speaker, the double að may look strange, but in Icelandic this is normal inside this fixed expression.
Why is it gefnu?
Because in the expression að því gefnu að, the word gefnu agrees with því, which is in the dative neuter singular.
So this phrase is not something you usually build from scratch as a beginner; it is best learned as a set expression:
- að því gefnu að = provided that
Still, grammatically, gefnu is the past participle of gefa in the form required by því.
Why is it komi and not kemur?
Because komi is the present subjunctive of koma, and after expressions like að því gefnu að, Icelandic often uses the subjunctive to show something that is:
- conditional
- uncertain
- not yet an established fact
So:
- kemur = indicative, more like a plain statement
- komi = subjunctive, appropriate for provided that ...
This is one of the most important grammar points in the sentence.
What does komi mean here? Does it literally mean comes?
Literally, yes, komi comes from koma = to come.
But with documents, attachments, applications, and similar things, Icelandic often uses koma in the sense of:
- arrive
- be received
- be submitted
So here fylgiskjalið komi is more naturally understood in English as:
- the attachment is received
- the supporting document is submitted
- the attachment arrives
rather than a very literal comes.
What case is fylgiskjalið, and why?
Fylgiskjalið is nominative singular neuter definite.
Why nominative? Because it is the subject of komi:
- fylgiskjalið komi = the attachment arrives / is submitted
So the document is the thing doing the arriving, grammatically speaking.
Does er samþykkt mean the claim is already approved, or that it will be approved later?
Literally, er samþykkt means is approved.
In formal or administrative language, though, a sentence like this often means something like:
- the claim is approved, provided that ...
- the claim stands approved on the condition that ...
So the approval is being stated, but with a condition attached. In practice, that often comes close to English will be approved provided that ..., even though Icelandic uses er.
Is this sentence formal?
Yes, very much so.
The formal tone comes especially from:
- bótakrafan
- samþykkt
- að því gefnu að
This sounds like administrative, legal, or bureaucratic Icelandic.
In less formal language, you might more often see a simpler conditional structure, such as one using ef for if, but að því gefnu að is a standard formal way to express provided that.
Could I replace að því gefnu að with ef?
Sometimes yes, but the meaning and tone are not exactly the same.
- ef = if
- að því gefnu að = provided that / on condition that
So ef is simpler and more neutral, while að því gefnu að sounds more formal and more explicitly conditional.
That means að því gefnu að is the better choice in official writing when the idea is not just if, but only on this condition.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning IcelandicMaster Icelandic — from Bótakrafan er samþykkt að því gefnu að fylgiskjalið komi to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions