Breakdown of Δεν έχω καμία αντιπάθεια για εκείνον, απλώς δεν τον ξέρω καλά.
Questions & Answers about Δεν έχω καμία αντιπάθεια για εκείνον, απλώς δεν τον ξέρω καλά.
Why are δεν and καμία both used? Doesn’t that make a double negative?
In Greek, this is normal. Greek uses negative concord, which means multiple negative words can appear in the same clause without “canceling each other out.”
So:
- Δεν έχω καμία αντιπάθεια = I don’t have any dislike / I have no dislike
Here:
- δεν = not
- καμία = no / any
In English, a double negative is often nonstandard, but in Greek this pattern is completely correct and very common.
Why is it καμία? What is it agreeing with?
Καμία agrees with αντιπάθεια, which is a feminine singular noun.
So:
- καμία = feminine singular form
- αντιπάθεια = feminine singular noun
If the noun were masculine or neuter, the form would change:
- κανέναν for masculine
- κανένα for neuter
So καμία αντιπάθεια means no dislike / no antipathy.
Is καμία the same as καμιά?
Yes, in many contexts they are basically the same word. The difference is mostly one of spelling/register:
- καμία is often seen as a bit more formal or careful in writing
- καμιά is very common in everyday language
In this sentence, both would be understood:
- Δεν έχω καμία αντιπάθεια...
- Δεν έχω καμιά αντιπάθεια...
Both are natural.
What exactly does αντιπάθεια mean here?
Αντιπάθεια means dislike, aversion, or antipathy.
So the sentence is not saying I hate him. It’s softer than that. It means something like:
- I don’t have anything against him
- I don’t dislike him
- I feel no antipathy toward him
It’s a fairly natural word when talking about your feelings toward a person.
Why is it για εκείνον?
After αντιπάθεια, Greek commonly uses για to mean toward / for someone.
So:
- αντιπάθεια για εκείνον = dislike toward him
This is a normal and idiomatic structure in Greek.
Why does it say εκείνον instead of αυτόν?
Both can refer to him, but they are not always identical in nuance.
- αυτόν often means simply him
- εκείνον can sound a bit more like that man / that person / him there, and may feel slightly more explicit or contrastive
In many contexts, both are possible, but εκείνον can sound a little more deliberate or detached.
Also, εκείνον is the accusative masculine singular form, which is needed here after για.
Why is there τον in δεν τον ξέρω καλά?
Τον is the direct object pronoun meaning him.
So:
- τον ξέρω = I know him
In Greek, when the object is a person, you often use a weak object pronoun like τον.
Here the sentence shifts from the fuller phrase εκείνον to the shorter clitic pronoun τον:
- για εκείνον = about/toward him
- δεν τον ξέρω καλά = I don’t know him well
That is completely normal Greek.
Why is it ξέρω and not γνωρίζω?
Both verbs can relate to knowing, but they are used a bit differently.
- ξέρω often means know
- γνωρίζω often means know / be acquainted with / meet
In everyday spoken Greek, ξέρω κάποιον καλά is very common for I know someone well.
So:
- δεν τον ξέρω καλά = I don’t know him well
This sounds natural and conversational.
What does καλά mean here?
Καλά means well.
So:
- τον ξέρω καλά = I know him well
- δεν τον ξέρω καλά = I don’t know him well
It is the adverb modifying ξέρω.
A learner might expect something like καλώς, but in Modern Greek καλά is the normal everyday word for well in this kind of sentence.
What does απλώς mean, and why is it there?
Απλώς means simply, just, or it’s just that.
It softens and clarifies the statement:
- Δεν έχω καμία αντιπάθεια για εκείνον = I have no dislike for him
- απλώς δεν τον ξέρω καλά = I just don’t know him well
So the speaker is correcting a possible misunderstanding: it’s not dislike, it’s only lack of familiarity.
Why is there a comma before απλώς?
The comma separates two closely connected ideas:
- I have no dislike toward him
- I just don’t know him well
Greek punctuation here works much like English. The comma helps show the pause and the explanatory contrast.
Can the word order change?
Yes, Greek word order is more flexible than English word order.
This sentence could be rearranged for emphasis, for example:
- Καμία αντιπάθεια δεν έχω για εκείνον, απλώς δεν τον ξέρω καλά.
- Δεν τον ξέρω καλά, απλώς δεν έχω καμία αντιπάθεια για εκείνον.
(possible, though the meaning focus changes)
The original version is very natural and neutral. Changing the order usually changes emphasis, not the basic meaning.
Is δεν τον ξέρω καλά literally I don’t know him well, or can it imply something more?
It literally means I don’t know him well, but in context it often implies:
- I’m not close to him
- I’m not familiar enough with him
- I haven’t gotten to know him properly
So the full sentence suggests: I’m not negative toward him; I just don’t know him well enough to have a strong opinion.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning GreekMaster Greek — from Δεν έχω καμία αντιπάθεια για εκείνον, απλώς δεν τον ξέρω καλά to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions