Log inSign up

Προλαβαίνεις να μου στείλεις μήνυμα πριν τη συνάντηση;

Προλαβαίνεις να μου στείλεις μήνυμα πριν τη συνάντηση;
Can you manage to send me a message before the meeting?

Breakdown of Προλαβαίνεις να μου στείλεις μήνυμα πριν τη συνάντηση;

να
to
πριν
before
μου
me
στέλνω
to send
το μήνυμα
the message
η συνάντηση
the meeting
προλαβαίνω
to make it in time / to catch
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Greek grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Greek now

Questions & Answers about Προλαβαίνεις να μου στείλεις μήνυμα πριν τη συνάντηση;

What does προλαβαίνεις literally mean, and why is it used here?

Προλαβαίνω literally comes from the idea of “getting ahead / getting there in time”. In everyday Greek it very often means “to have time to (do something)” or “to manage to (before a deadline)”.
So Προλαβαίνεις να…; = “Do you have time to…?” / “Can you manage to…?” (before something else happens).

Is this sentence asking about ability (can you) or time/availability (do you have time)?

Mostly time/availability. Greek uses Προλαβαίνεις; to ask whether someone can fit something in in time, not whether they are capable.
If you wanted “Are you able to?” in the skill/ability sense, you’d more likely use μπορείς.

Why is there a να after προλαβαίνεις?

Greek commonly uses να + verb to form a subordinate clause meaning “to do…”.
Here: Προλαβαίνεις να μου στείλεις… = “Do you have time to send me…”.

Why is στείλεις in this form, and what tense/mood is it?

στείλεις is the aorist subjunctive form of στέλνω (to send). After να, Greek uses the subjunctive.
Aorist here doesn’t mean past; it often indicates a single, complete action: “send (one) message” (as a completed act), rather than “be sending”.

Could it also be να μου στέλνεις μήνυμα? What’s the difference?

Yes, but it changes the nuance:

  • να μου στείλεις μήνυμα (aorist subjunctive): “to send me a message (once)” / “shoot me a message”
  • να μου στέλνεις μήνυμα (present subjunctive): suggests repeated/ongoing sending, like “to be sending me messages” or “to send me messages (regularly)”.
    In this context (before the meeting), the aorist στείλεις is the natural choice.
What does μου do here, and why is it before the verb?

μου is an unstressed object pronoun meaning “to me / me”.
Greek places these short pronouns before the verb in neutral word order: να μου στείλεις = “to send me”.

Why is it μήνυμα (singular) instead of ένα μήνυμα (“a message”)?

Greek often omits the equivalent of “a” in casual speech when it’s understood.
So να μου στείλεις μήνυμα naturally means “send me a message” even without ένα. Adding ένα makes it slightly more explicit: να μου στείλεις ένα μήνυμα.

Is μήνυμα “text message” specifically, or any kind of message?

μήνυμα can mean “message” generally, but in modern everyday contexts it very commonly means a text/DM. If you want to specify SMS you could say sms or μήνυμα στο κινητό, but usually context covers it.

Why is it πριν τη συνάντηση and not πριν από τη συνάντηση?

Both are correct:

  • πριν τη συνάντηση is a common shorter form (especially in speech).
  • πριν από τη συνάντηση is a bit more explicit/formal.
    They mean the same: “before the meeting.”
What is happening with τη? Is it “the”?

Yes. τη is the accusative feminine singular form of the definite article η (the).
συνάντηση is feminine, and after πριν it goes in the accusative: πριν τη συνάντηση.

Is συνάντηση “meeting” in the business sense, or can it be any meetup?

It can be both. συνάντηση is general: any meeting/appointment/get-together. Context decides whether it’s a work meeting or a personal one.

Is this sentence polite, casual, or formal?

It’s neutral to casual, because it uses 2nd person singular (Προλαβαίνεις). It’s appropriate for friends, colleagues you’re on first-name terms with, etc.
To be more formal/polite, you’d use 2nd person plural:

  • Προλαβαίνετε να μου στείλετε μήνυμα πριν τη συνάντηση;
How would you answer “Yes” or “No” naturally in Greek?

Common natural answers:

  • Ναι, προλαβαίνω. = “Yes, I’ll have time.”
  • Ναι, θα σου στείλω. = “Yes, I’ll send you (a message).”
  • Όχι, δεν προλαβαίνω. = “No, I won’t have time.”
  • Δύσκολα, δεν νομίζω να προλάβω. = “Probably not / I don’t think I’ll make it in time.”
Why is there no explicit future tense like θα in the question?

Greek doesn’t need θα here because Προλαβαίνεις να…; already frames the situation as “Will you have time (to do it) before then?” It’s about feasibility within a time window.
You can add future in some contexts, but it’s not necessary and often sounds less natural here.

Can the word order change, like Πριν τη συνάντηση, προλαβαίνεις να μου στείλεις μήνυμα;?

Yes. Greek is flexible with word order.
Πριν τη συνάντηση, … emphasizes the time condition (“Before the meeting—can you…?”). The original order is more neutral.