Learn Hardcore Greek: Μετά τη βόλτα συνειδητοποιώ πόσο με βοηθάει η φύση να είμαι πιο ήρεμος. - After the walk I realize how much nature helps me to be calmer.

Μετά τη βόλτα συνειδητοποιώ πόσο με βοηθάει η φύση να είμαι πιο ήρεμος.

After the walk I realize how much nature helps me to be calmer.

Breakdown of Μετά τη βόλτα συνειδητοποιώ πόσο με βοηθάει η φύση να είμαι πιο ήρεμος.

Elon.io is an online learning platform

We have an entire course teaching Greek grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Greek now

Questions & Answers about Μετά τη βόλτα συνειδητοποιώ πόσο με βοηθάει η φύση να είμαι πιο ήρεμος.

Why is τη used before βόλτα, and what form is it?

Τη is the feminine singular definite article in the accusative case (object case).

Nominative (subject): η βόλτα – the walk (as subject)
Accusative (object): τη(ν) βόλτα – the walk (as object, or after a preposition)

After the preposition μετά (after), Greek normally uses the accusative case, so η βόλτα becomes τη βόλτα.

In careful/formal writing you may see την βόλτα; in everyday speech and modern writing, the final -ν of την is usually dropped before consonants like β, so την βόλτα → τη βόλτα. Both are understood as the same form.

Why does μετά take the accusative (τη βόλτα) and not another case?

In modern Greek, μετά (after) used as a preposition is followed by the accusative:

μετά τη βόλτα – after the walk
μετά το φαγητό – after the meal

Ancient Greek had multiple cases (genitive, dative) used with μετά, but in modern Greek the standard pattern is: preposition + accusative. So τη βόλτα is just the regular modern Greek construction.

Why is συνειδητοποιώ in the present tense instead of a past tense?

Συνειδητοποιώ is present tense, first person singular: I realize / I am realizing.

Using the present here describes something that happens habitually or generally after a walk, not just once:

Μετά τη βόλτα συνειδητοποιώ…
→ After the walk I (tend to) realize / I realize (each time) how much nature helps me…

If you wanted to describe a specific past occasion, you’d use the aorist (simple past):

Μετά τη βόλτα συνειδητοποίησα πόσο με βοηθάει η φύση…
→ After the walk I realized how much nature helps me…

So the present here gives a sense of a repeated or typical experience rather than a one‑time event.

What is the difference between βοηθά and βοηθάει, and why is βοηθάει used here?

Both βοηθά and βοηθάει are correct present tense forms of the verb βοηθάω / βοηθώ (to help), third person singular:

με βοηθά = it helps me
με βοηθάει = it helps me

Meaning is the same. Βοηθάει is slightly more colloquial and “full”, while βοηθά sounds a bit shorter / more neutral. Many verbs in -άω / -ώ have this double form:

μιλά / μιλάει – he/she speaks
κρατά / κρατάει – he/she holds

In this sentence, βοηθάει is just a stylistic choice; πόσο με βοηθά η φύση would also be correct.

Why is the object pronoun με placed before βοηθάει and not after it?

Με is the unstressed clitic pronoun “me” (accusative). In Greek, unstressed object pronouns normally go before the verb:

με βοηθάει – it helps me
σε βλέπω – I see you
τον ακούω – I hear him

Putting με after the verb (βοηθάει με) is generally wrong in standard Greek, except in a few special emphatic or fixed expressions. The normal pattern is:

[clitic pronoun] + [verb]

So πόσο με βοηθάει η φύση literally is how much me it-helps nature, which in English is reordered to how much nature helps me.

Why is the subject η φύση placed after με βοηθάει? Could we say η φύση με βοηθάει?

Yes, you can say η φύση με βοηθάει; that’s also perfectly correct.

Greek word order is relatively flexible, because subjects, objects, etc., are marked by endings and articles. Both:

πόσο με βοηθάει η φύση
πόσο η φύση με βοηθάει

mean the same: how much nature helps me.

In the original sentence, putting η φύση later makes the phrase πόσο με βοηθάει flow as a unit, with η φύση coming almost as a “conclusion” — how much it helps me, this thing: nature. It’s more about style and rhythm than strict grammar.

What does να είμαι express here? Is it like an infinitive?

Modern Greek does not have a true infinitive like English to be, to go, to help. Instead, it uses να + finite verb, which very often corresponds to English “to + verb” or “in order to + verb”.

να είμαι ≈ to be
να πάω ≈ to go
να βοηθήσω ≈ to help / to give help

In the sentence:

…πόσο με βοηθάει η φύση να είμαι πιο ήρεμος.

Να είμαι shows the result or purpose of the helping:

how much nature helps me *to be calmer*
or: how much nature helps me *become / stay calmer*

So yes, να είμαι functions similarly to an English infinitive here.

Why is it πιο ήρεμος and not some other form? How does πιο work?

Πιο means “more” and is used to form the comparative of adjectives:

ήρεμος – calm
πιο ήρεμος – calmer / more calm

Unlike English, where the adjective itself can change (calm → calmer), in modern Greek the adjective usually stays the same, and the word πιο does the comparative job:

όμορφος → πιο όμορφος – beautiful → more beautiful
γρήγορος → πιο γρήγορος – fast → faster

So:

να είμαι πιο ήρεμος
to be calmer / to be more calm

is formed by πιο + base form of the adjective (ήρεμος).

Why is ήρεμος masculine? What if the speaker is a woman?

Ήρεμος is the masculine form of the adjective calm. Adjectives agree in gender, number, and case with the noun or pronoun they describe.

Here, ήρεμος agrees with the implied subject (εγώ):

If the speaker is male:
να είμαι πιο ήρεμος – to be calmer (masc.)
If the speaker is female:
να είμαι πιο ήρεμη – to be calmer (fem.)

So a woman would naturally say:

Μετά τη βόλτα συνειδητοποιώ πόσο με βοηθάει η φύση να είμαι πιο ήρεμη.

The rest of the sentence stays the same; only the adjective changes to match the speaker’s gender.

Could we also say πόσο πολύ με βοηθάει η φύση instead of πόσο με βοηθάει η φύση?

Yes. Both:

πόσο με βοηθάει η φύση
πόσο πολύ με βοηθάει η φύση

are correct and natural.

Πόσο by itself already expresses degree / how much. Adding πολύ (much, a lot) makes it slightly more emphatic, like:

πόσο – how much
πόσο πολύ – how very much / how much indeed

So:

συνειδητοποιώ πόσο πολύ με βοηθάει η φύση να είμαι πιο ήρεμος.

feels a bit stronger emotionally than the version without πολύ, but the basic meaning is the same.

What is the nuance difference between μετά and αφού, since both can mean “after”?

Both can relate to “after,” but they work differently:

Μετά is a preposition or adverb meaning “after” (in time):
- μετά τη βόλτα – after the walk
- μετά θα πάμε σπίτι – afterward we’ll go home
Αφού is a conjunction meaning roughly “after / when / since”, and usually introduces a clause with a verb:
- Αφού κάναμε βόλτα, συνειδητοποίησα…
  → After we took a walk, I realized…
- Αφού με βοηθάει η φύση, είμαι πιο ήρεμος.
  → Since nature helps me, I’m calmer.

So:

Μετά τη βόλτα συνειδητοποιώ… – After the walk I realize…
Αφού κάνω βόλτα, συνειδητοποιώ… – After I (have) a walk / Once I’ve had a walk, I realize…

You can’t just swap μετά and αφού without changing the sentence structure.