Breakdown of Wir tauen das Brot erst morgen auf; heute frieren wir den Rest lieber ein.
Questions & Answers about Wir tauen das Brot erst morgen auf; heute frieren wir den Rest lieber ein.
Why are auftauen and einfrieren split up in this sentence?
Because they are separable verbs.
- auftauen → Wir tauen ... auf
- einfrieren → Wir frieren ... ein
In a normal main clause, the conjugated verb goes in second position, and the separable prefix goes to the end of the clause.
So:
- Wir tauen das Brot morgen auf.
- Heute frieren wir den Rest ein.
But when the verb is in the infinitive, the parts stay together:
- Wir wollen das Brot morgen auftauen.
- Wir möchten den Rest einfrieren.
Why is it Heute frieren wir ... and not Heute wir frieren ...?
This is the standard verb-second rule in German.
In a German main clause, the finite verb must be in second position. The first position can be taken by different elements, not just the subject.
So if you start with heute, the verb must come next:
- Heute frieren wir den Rest ein.
Structure:
- Heute = position 1
- frieren = position 2
- wir = comes after the verb
This is often called inversion from an English learner’s point of view.
Compare:
- Wir frieren heute den Rest ein.
- Heute frieren wir den Rest ein.
Both are correct; the second one emphasizes today more.
Why are das Brot and den Rest in those forms?
They are the direct objects of the verbs, so they are in the accusative case.
- das Brot is neuter singular, and das is the same in nominative and accusative.
- der Rest is masculine singular, so in the accusative it changes to den Rest.
So:
- das Brot = accusative of das Brot
- den Rest = accusative of der Rest
This happens because:
- etwas auftauen = to thaw something
- etwas einfrieren = to freeze something
What does erst mean here?
Here, erst morgen means not until tomorrow or only tomorrow.
So Wir tauen das Brot erst morgen auf means the action will wait until tomorrow.
This use of erst is very common with time expressions:
- Ich komme erst am Abend. = I’m not coming until the evening.
- Er ist erst 16. = He’s only 16.
So in this sentence, erst adds the idea of delay or not before.
Why are both verbs in the present tense even though one action happens tomorrow?
German often uses the present tense to talk about the future, especially when there is a clear time word like morgen.
So:
- Wir tauen das Brot erst morgen auf
naturally means - We’ll thaw the bread tomorrow / We’re not thawing the bread until tomorrow
German does have a future form with werden, but it is often unnecessary here:
- Wir werden das Brot erst morgen auftauen.
That is grammatical, but the simple present is more common in everyday speech when the time is already clear.
Why is lieber used here, and what exactly does it mean?
Lieber means rather or preferably.
In this sentence:
- heute frieren wir den Rest lieber ein
it means something like:
- today we’d rather freeze the rest
So the speaker is expressing a preference: instead of thawing the bread today, freezing the rest today seems like the better option.
A few related forms:
- gern = gladly / like to
- lieber = rather / prefer
- am liebsten = most of all / preferably most
Example:
- Ich trinke lieber Tee. = I’d rather drink tea.
Why does lieber come before ein?
Because ein is the separable prefix of einfrieren, and in a main clause that prefix goes to the end of the clause.
So the clause is built like this:
- Heute
- frieren
- wir
- den Rest
- lieber
- ein
The adverb lieber sits in the middle of the clause, while the prefix ein must wait until the end.
This is normal with separable verbs:
- Ich kaufe heute lieber ein.
- Wir räumen das später auf.
Why is the subject wir repeated after the semicolon?
Because the semicolon separates two main clauses, and each main clause normally needs its own subject.
The sentence is really:
- Wir tauen das Brot erst morgen auf;
- heute frieren wir den Rest lieber ein.
Even though the subject is the same in both parts, German normally states it again in a new main clause.
This makes the structure clear and natural.
What is the function of the semicolon here?
The semicolon links two closely related independent clauses.
It is stronger than a comma and weaker than a full stop.
So the writer is showing:
- these are two complete clauses
- they are closely connected in meaning
You could also write this as two sentences:
- Wir tauen das Brot erst morgen auf. Heute frieren wir den Rest lieber ein.
Or with a conjunction:
- Wir tauen das Brot erst morgen auf, aber heute frieren wir den Rest lieber ein.
The semicolon is a stylistic way to connect the two ideas neatly.
Can auftauen also be used without an object?
Yes. Auftauen can be both transitive and intransitive.
In this sentence it is transitive:
- Wir tauen das Brot auf.
= We thaw the bread.
But it can also be intransitive:
- Das Brot taut auf.
= The bread is thawing / thaws out.
So German can express either:
- someone thaws something or
- something thaws
The same kind of thing often happens in English too.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning GermanMaster German — from Wir tauen das Brot erst morgen auf; heute frieren wir den Rest lieber ein to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions