Breakdown of Später lese ich im Kochbuch und finde ein Rezept für Zitronen‑Honig‑Tee.
und
and
in
in
dem
the; (masculine or neuter, dative)
ich
I
lesen
to read
finden
to find
später
later
für
for
das Rezept
the recipe
das Kochbuch
the cookbook
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching German grammar and vocabulary.
Questions & Answers about Später lese ich im Kochbuch und finde ein Rezept für Zitronen‑Honig‑Tee.
Why is Später at the beginning of the sentence, and how does this affect the verb and subject order?
In German main clauses the finite verb must be in the second position (V2 word order). By fronting the time adverb Später, you occupy position 1. The verb lese then moves to position 2, and the subject ich follows in position 3:
Später | lese | ich | im Kochbuch …
Why is there no comma before und in “lese ich im Kochbuch und finde …”?
When two verbs share the same subject in one main clause and are simply linked by und, German does not use a comma. Here you have one clause with two coordinated verb phrases: lese … und finde ….
What case and meaning does im Kochbuch have, and why is im used instead of in dem?
Im is a contraction of in + dem. Kochbuch is neuter (das Kochbuch). The preposition in takes the dative when indicating location (“in the cookbook”), so in dem Kochbuch becomes im Kochbuch.
Why is the subject ich not repeated before finde, and is this grammatically correct?
Yes—it’s correct. In German you can omit the subject in the second coordinated verb phrase if it’s the same as in the first. The understood subject for finde is still ich.
Why is the present tense used here instead of a future tense like werde lesen?
German often uses the present tense with a clear time adverbial (here Später) to express future actions. It’s more natural and simpler than using werden + infinitive unless you need to emphasize or clarify.
What is the function of für in ein Rezept für Zitronen‑Honig‑Tee, and which case does it govern?
Für means “for” and always takes the accusative case. Thus ein Rezept is the direct object of finden, and Zitronen‑Honig‑Tee is in an accusative prepositional phrase: für Zitronen‑Honig‑Tee.
Why is ein Rezept in the accusative case?
Because it’s the direct object of the verb finden. In German, direct objects must appear in the accusative.
How do you parse Zitronen‑Honig‑Tee, and why are hyphens used instead of writing one long word?
This is a three-part compound noun: Zitronen (plural/genitive stem), Honig, Tee. Hyphens improve readability in longer compounds, making it clear you’re talking about “lemon‑honey tea” rather than some other combination.
Why isn’t there any article before Zitronen‑Honig‑Tee (e.g., not den Tee)?
You can omit the article when referring to a generic substance or category (here: the type of tea). Although für requires accusative, there’s simply no article to inflect, so you get für Zitronen‑Honig‑Tee.