Sie zeigen mir eine Karte, die den Weg über die neue Brücke zeigt.

Sie zeigen mir eine Karte, die den Weg über die neue Brücke zeigt.
They show me a map that shows the way over the new bridge.

Breakdown of Sie zeigen mir eine Karte, die den Weg über die neue Brücke zeigt.

neu
new
zeigen
to show
mir
me
über
over
sie
they
die Karte
the map
die
that
die Brücke
the bridge
der Weg
the way
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching German grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning German now

Questions & Answers about Sie zeigen mir eine Karte, die den Weg über die neue Brücke zeigt.

Why is mir used instead of mich?

In German, mir is the dative form of “I,” while mich is the accusative. The verb zeigen (“to show”) normally takes two objects:

  • A direct object (accusative) for what is shown (here eine Karte),
  • An indirect object (dative) for whom it is shown (here mir).
    So mir is correct because you are the person receiving the showing.
Why is the verb zeigt placed at the end of the relative clause?

German subordinate clauses—including relative clauses introduced by die—always send the finite verb to the end.
Structure of our relative clause:
– die (relative pronoun)
– den Weg (direct object)
– über die neue Brücke (prepositional phrase)
– zeigt (verb)

What does the relative pronoun die refer to, and why is it in the nominative case?
The relative pronoun die refers back to eine Karte (feminine singular). In a relative clause, the pronoun takes the case required by its function in that clause. Here, die is the subject of zeigt, so it’s nominative feminine singular, matching Karte.
Why is it den Weg and not der Weg or dem Weg?
Weg is a masculine noun (der Weg in the nominative). In the relative clause it’s the direct object of zeigt, so it must be accusative. The masculine accusative article is den, hence den Weg.
Why does über take the accusative article die here instead of dative?
Über is a two-way (Wechsel­präposition). When it indicates direction or movement “across” something, it takes accusative. Our clause shows the way going over the new bridge, implying movement, so we use über die neue Brücke (accusative).
Could we use auf or entlang instead of über? How would the meaning change?

– auf die neue Brücke would mean “onto/onto the surface of the bridge,” focusing more on the act of getting onto it.
– entlang der neuen Brücke (using dative) means “along the side of the bridge,” suggesting you travel alongside it rather than over it.
Each preposition gives a subtly different spatial nuance.

Why is there a comma before the relative clause?
In German, you always separate a relative clause from the main clause with a comma. It marks the beginning of a subordinate clause (“die den Weg … zeigt”) and is mandatory.
Could we replace the relative pronoun die with welche?
Yes, grammatically you could say eine Karte, welche den Weg … zeigt, but in modern spoken and written German die (or der/das matching gender/number) is far more common. welche sounds more formal or bookish.
Does Sie mean “they,” “she,” or the formal “you”?

At the beginning of a sentence Sie is capitalized, so it could be the formal “you” plural or singular. If it were “they,” you’d write sie in lowercase (unless it starts the sentence). Context tells you which meaning applies:

  • Sie zeigen mir … (formal “you” show me)
  • sie zeigen mir … (“they” show me)