Log inSign up

Vien kynän ja kumin takaisin koululaukkuun illalla.

Vien kynän ja kumin takaisin koululaukkuun illalla.
I take the pen and the eraser back to the school bag in the evening.
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Finnish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Finnish now

Questions & Answers about Vien kynän ja kumin takaisin koululaukkuun illalla.

What does the verb vien come from, and why is it used here?

Vien is the 1st person singular (I) present tense of the verb viedä.

  • viedä = to take (something somewhere), especially away from the speaker’s current location.
  • tuoda = to bring (something) towards the speaker or another reference point.

So:

  • Vien kynän... = I take / I will take the pencil... (away from “here” to somewhere else).
  • If you said Tuon kynän..., it would mean I bring the pencil (here / to you).

Finnish normally uses the present tense for both present and near-future:

  • Vien kynän... can mean I take the pencil... or I will take the pencil..., depending on context. Finnish has no separate “will” future tense.
Why do kynä and kumi have the -n ending (kynän, kumin)?

The -n ending here marks a total object (traditionally called “accusative/genitive”). It’s used when:

  • The object is countable, and
  • The action is completed/goal-oriented: you will fully carry out the taking.

So:

  • kynä → kynän
  • kumi → kumin

Compare:

  • Vien kynän. – I (will) take the pencil (completely).
  • Vien kynää. – I am taking (some) pencil / I’m in the process of taking a pencil. (more like ongoing or partial; context decides)

In this sentence, you clearly mean you will fully take one pencil and one eraser, so kynän and kumin get -n.

Why doesn’t kumi mean “rubber” in the condom sense here? What does it usually mean?

The word kumi literally means rubber (the material). From that, it also means:

  • kumi = a rubber eraser (the school item)
  • In compounds like kumisaappaat = rubber boots

Yes, kumi can also be used as slang for a condom, but in a school context with a pencil it is naturally understood as an eraser. Context is very strong in Finnish.

If you want to be very clear in a school context, you can also say pyyhekumi (“wiping rubber”), which specifically means an eraser.

Why is it koululaukkuun and not just koululaukku?

Koululaukkuun is in the illative case, which often corresponds to English “into / in(to)”.

Breakdown:

  • koulu = school
  • laukku = bag
  • koululaukku = school bag (compound noun)
  • koululaukkuun = into the school bag

The illative ending is typically -Vn (vowel + n):

  • talo → taloon (into the house)
  • laukku → laukkuun (into the bag)
  • koululaukku → koululaukkuun (into the school bag)

If you used koululaukku alone (nominative), you’d just be naming the bag, not indicating movement into it. The verb viedä here clearly describes moving something into a container, so koululaukkuun is needed.

What’s the function of takaisin, and where should it go in the sentence?

Takaisin means back (as in back to where it was before).

  • Vien kynän ja kumin takaisin koululaukkuun.
    = I (will) take the pencil and eraser back into the school bag.

About position:

  • Takaisin usually appears near the verb or the place word:
    • Vien kynän takaisin koululaukkuun.
    • Vien kynän koululaukkuun takaisin. (also possible, but less neutral)
  • The version in your sentence is very natural:
    Vien kynän ja kumin takaisin koululaukkuun illalla.

If you remove takaisin, it just means you’re taking them into the bag, not necessarily back to an earlier location.

Why is it koululaukkuun and not kouluun? Don’t both involve koulu “school”?

Yes, both contain koulu, but they refer to different things:

  • koulu alone = the school (institution/building)
    • kouluun = to (the) school / into the school
  • koululaukku = school bag (a compound noun, a physical object you carry)
    • koululaukkuun = into the school bag

So:

  • Vien kynän kouluun. = I take the pencil to school.
  • Vien kynän koululaukkuun. = I take the pencil into the school bag.

Different destination, different meaning.

Why does koululaukku have no space between the words “school” and “bag”?

Finnish usually writes compound nouns as one word:

  • koulu
    • laukku → koululaukku (school bag)
  • kieli
    • koulu → kielikoulu (language school)
  • kirja
    • kauppa → kirjakauppa (bookstore)

In English, we often use two words (school bag), but in Finnish the default is to merge them into one. In writing, a space would be wrong here: koululaukku is correct, koulu laukku is not.

What does illalla mean exactly, and why that form instead of something like iltaan or illassa?

Illalla comes from ilta = evening and is in the adessive case used for time expressions.

Common time expressions:

  • illalla = in the evening / this evening (at some time during the evening)
  • aamulla = in the morning
  • yöllä = at night

We don’t normally say iltaan or illassa in this generic sense of “in the evening”:

  • iltaan (illative) would be more like into the evening (rare, special contexts).
  • illassa (inessive) could mean in an evening but is not the standard way to say in the evening as a normal time adverb.

So illalla is the natural, fixed way to express in the evening.

Why is the subject “I” (minä) missing? How do we know it’s “I”?

Finnish usually drops personal pronouns, because the verb ending already shows the person.

  • vien = I take / I will take
  • viet = you (singular) take
  • vie = he/she takes
  • viedään = we/people/they take (passive)
  • viemme = we take
  • viette = you (plural) take
  • vievät = they take

So:

  • Vien kynän... = I take the pencil... (no need to say minä)
  • You can add minä for emphasis or contrast:
    • Minä vien kynän... = I (as opposed to someone else) will take the pencil...
Why isn’t there a word for “my” in “my school bag”?

Finnish often leaves out possessive words like “my”, “your” when the ownership is obvious from context.

In this sentence, it’s natural to assume it’s your own school bag:

  • Vien kynän ja kumin takaisin koululaukkuun illalla.
    = I’ll put them back in (my) school bag this evening.

If you want to mark possession explicitly, you have two main options:

  1. Use a possessive suffix on the noun:

    • koululaukkuuni = into my school bag
      → Vien kynän ja kumin takaisin koululaukkuuni illalla.

  2. Use a pronoun minun with or without the suffix (more emphatic/formal):

    • minun koululaukkuuni (into my school bag)

But in everyday speech, for a routine sentence like this, no explicit “my” is needed.

Can the word order change? For example, can I say Illalla vien kynän ja kumin takaisin koululaukkuun?

Yes, Finnish word order is flexible, and your example is perfectly correct.

Your original:

  • Vien kynän ja kumin takaisin koululaukkuun illalla.
    (neutral, focus on “what I do”; “in the evening” is just extra info at the end)

Alternative:

  • Illalla vien kynän ja kumin takaisin koululaukkuun.
    (emphasis on when: In the evening is what you highlight)

Both mean the same thing; only the focus shifts:

  • Putting illalla first often answers a “when” question, or contrasts times:
    • En nyt, mutta *illalla vien kynän ja kumin takaisin koululaukkuun.
      (*Not now, but this evening I’ll take the pencil and eraser back into the school bag.      )
Why do both kynä and kumi get the -n ending, even though they’re joined by ja (“and”)?

Each noun in a list of objects takes its own case ending in Finnish.

So you have:

  • kynä → kynän
  • kumi → kumin
  • joined by ja (“and”):
    → kynän ja kumin

Other examples:

  • Ostan leivän ja maidon. – I (will) buy the bread and the milk.
  • Näen koiran ja kissan. – I see the dog and the cat.

Both parts of the list behave as separate objects, even though they share the same verb.