Log inSign up

Kun pesen kasvoni illalla, olo tuntuu paremmalta.

Kun pesen kasvoni illalla, olo tuntuu paremmalta.
When I wash my face in the evening, I feel better.
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Finnish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Finnish now

Questions & Answers about Kun pesen kasvoni illalla, olo tuntuu paremmalta.

What does kun mean here, and is it always translated as “when”?

Kun is a subordinating conjunction. In this sentence it means “when” in the sense of “whenever / when(ever) it happens that…”.

Common meanings of kun:

  • when (time clause):
    • Kun pesen kasvoni illalla, … = When(ever) I wash my face in the evening, …
  • because (informal spoken Finnish, depending on context):
    • En tullut, kun olin sairas. = I didn’t come, because I was sick.

Here it clearly introduces a time clause, not a reason.

Why is there a comma after illalla in Finnish? In English we don’t always use a comma there.

In Finnish, you must separate a subordinate clause from the main clause with a comma.

  • Kun pesen kasvoni illalla, olo tuntuu paremmalta.
    • Kun pesen kasvoni illalla = subordinate clause
    • olo tuntuu paremmalta = main clause

Even if in English you might write:

  • When I wash my face in the evening I feel better. (often without comma)

In Finnish the comma is obligatory between the clauses.

Why is it pesen and not some special future tense like “will wash”?

Finnish has no separate future tense. The present tense is used for:

  • Present time: Pesin kasvoni nyt. (I’m washing my face now.)
    – Actually that’s past; let's correct: Present is Pesen kasvoni nyt.
  • Near future: Pesen kasvoni kohta. (I’ll wash my face soon.)
  • General truths / habits: Kun pesen kasvoni illalla, … (When I wash my face in the evening, … / Whenever I wash my face in the evening, …)

So pesen covers what English divides into “wash” and “will wash”; context tells you which it is.

Why is it kasvoni and not just kasvot?
  • kasvot = face (literally “faces”, always plural in Finnish)
  • kasvoni = my face

kasvoni is kasvot in the genitive singular (kasvon) plus the 1st person singular possessive suffix -ni (my):

  • kasvo (stem)
  • kasvon (genitive singular)
  • kasvoni = my face

So pesen kasvoni = I wash my face.

Using just kasvot would sound like “I wash the face / faces” with no owner specified; in practice you nearly always mark the possessor here.

Why is there no minun before kasvoni, like minun kasvoni?

The possessive suffix -ni on the noun already shows “my”, so minun is usually not needed and would sound emphatic:

  • pesen kasvoni = I wash my face (normal)
  • pesen minun kasvoni = more like I wash my face (not someone else’s)

In neutral sentences, Finns usually use either:

  • minun kasvot (pronoun only, no suffix)
  • kasvoni (suffix only)

Here kasvoni is the natural choice.

Why do we say pesen kasvoni and not something like a reflexive verb “I wash myself”?

Finnish doesn’t use reflexive verbs in the same way as many European languages. Instead, it usually uses:

  • A normal transitive verb
    • the body part as the object, with a possessive marker:
      • Pesin käteni. = I washed my hands.
      • Pesin hiukseni. = I washed my hair.
      • Pesen kasvoni. = I wash my face.

There is a reflexive marker -tA in some constructions, but for everyday actions like washing your own body parts, Finnish prefers “I wash my X”, not “I wash myself”.

What exactly does olo mean? Is it just “feeling”?

Olo roughly means “feeling, state, condition” (how you feel in yourself). It’s often used in fixed expressions about physical or mental state:

  • Minulla on hyvä olo. = I feel good / I’m in a good state.
  • On huono olo. = I feel bad / I’m not feeling well.
  • Olo tuntuu paremmalta. = The feeling / my condition feels better.

It’s not interchangeable with every use of English “feeling”, but specifically about how you feel overall.

Why is it olo tuntuu and not something like “minä tunnen oloni paremmaksi”?

You can say:

  • Minä tunnen oloni paremmaksi. (more formal / explicit)

But Finnish very often uses a construction where “olo” is the subject and the verb is tuntua:

  • olo tuntuu paremmalta = the feeling / state feels better

This is very natural and common. It focuses on the state itself rather than on “I feel”. Both are correct, but olo tuntuu paremmalta is shorter and very idiomatic.

Why is paremmalta in that form with -lta/-ltä? What case is that?

Paremmalta is the ablative case of parempi (better).

Pattern:

  • hyvä → parempi (good → better)
  • ablative: paremmalta

Many “sense” verbs in Finnish — including tuntua (to feel, to seem), maistua (to taste), näyttää (to look, to seem), kuulostaa (to sound) — typically take their complement in the ablative (-lta/-ltä):

  • Se tuntuu hyvältä. = It feels good.
  • Kahvi maistuu pahalta. = The coffee tastes bad.
  • Olo tuntuu paremmalta. = I feel better / The feeling is better.

So tuntua + ablative is a standard pattern.

Could we say tuntuu paremmalta without olo?

Yes, especially in colloquial speech, people often drop olo and the subject is understood from context:

  • Kun pesen kasvoni illalla, tuntuu paremmalta.

This is like saying in English: When I wash my face in the evening, feels better.
It’s slightly more casual and relies on context to know who feels better (usually “I”).

In careful written Finnish, olo tuntuu paremmalta is clearer and more complete.

Could we change the word order to Olo tuntuu paremmalta, kun pesen kasvoni illalla?

Yes, that word order is also correct:

  • Kun pesen kasvoni illalla, olo tuntuu paremmalta.
  • Olo tuntuu paremmalta, kun pesen kasvoni illalla.

The meaning is the same. The difference is a matter of focus:

  • Starting with kun emphasises the condition / time.
  • Starting with olo tuntuu paremmalta puts more focus on the result.

Both are natural Finnish.

Why is it illalla and not iltaisin? What’s the difference?

Both relate to “evening”, but they differ in nuance:

  • illalla = in the evening (literally “at evening”)
    • Can be a specific evening or each evening, depending on context.
  • iltaisin = in the evenings / in the evening(s) as a habit

So:

  • Kun pesen kasvoni illalla…
    • Often understood as a typical / usual evening routine, but can also be more specific.
  • Kun pesen kasvoni iltaisin…
    • Emphasises habitual, repeated action: whenever it’s evening / evenings in general.

Both could work here. illalla is slightly more neutral and common in everyday speech.

Why is there no minä (I) before pesen or olo tuntuu?

In Finnish, the person is built into the verb ending, so the subject pronoun is often omitted when it’s clear from context:

  • pesen = (I) wash
  • tuntuu = (it) feels

You only add minä (or other pronouns) for emphasis or to avoid ambiguity:

  • Minä pesen kasvoni, en sinä. = I wash my face, not you.

In neutral statements like this sentence, leaving out minä is the natural, unmarked choice.