Breakdown of Minäkin haluan mennä samaan konserttiin, jos saan lipun.
minä
I
mennä
to go
haluta
to want
saada
to get
jos
if
konsertti
the concert
kin
also
sama
same
lippu
the ticket
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Finnish grammar and vocabulary.
Questions & Answers about Minäkin haluan mennä samaan konserttiin, jos saan lipun.
Why is the personal pronoun minä included here? Isn’t haluan enough to show the subject?
Although Finnish verbs carry person information, adding minä puts explicit emphasis on “I.” It also lets you attach the particle -kin to the pronoun (see next question).
What does the particle -kin express in minäkin?
The suffix -kin means “also” or “too.” So minäkin literally means “I too” or “even I.”
How does the verb phrase haluan mennä work? Why are there two verbs?
Finnish expresses “want to do something” with haluta + infinitive. Here haluan (I want) is the 1st-person singular present of haluta, and mennä is the first infinitive “to go.” Together: “I want to go.”
What case is samaan konserttiin, and why is it used?
It’s the illative case, which indicates movement into something: “to the same concert.” sama → samaan, konsertti → konserttiin (adding –an and –in).
Why is lipun in the genitive/accusative (lipun) rather than the partitive (lippua)?
After verbs like saada (“to get/receive”) that take a complete, singular object, Finnish uses the accusative (which looks like the genitive). lipun shows you get one entire ticket. The partitive lippua would imply an incomplete action or indefinite amount (“some ticket”).
What is the role of jos in jos saan lipun?
jos means “if,” introducing a conditional clause: jos saan lipun = “if I get a ticket.”
Is the comma before jos saan lipun mandatory?
Standard Finnish punctuation places a comma before most subordinate clauses, including those with jos. In very casual writing it might be dropped, but it’s recommended in formal text.
Can I move jos saan lipun to the front? How does that affect emphasis?
Yes. Jos saan lipun, minäkin haluan mennä samaan konserttiin is perfectly fine. Putting the if-clause first highlights the condition, but the overall meaning stays the same.
Why is saan (I get) in the present tense when it refers to a future possibility?
Finnish does not have a separate future tense; the present tense covers both present and future actions. Context tells you saan refers to a hoped-for future ticket.