Breakdown of De arts schreef pillen voor die ik moet innemen.
Questions & Answers about De arts schreef pillen voor die ik moet innemen.
Why is voor separated from schreef in schreef ... voor?
Because voorschrijven is a separable verb in Dutch.
- Full verb: voorschrijven = to prescribe
In a main clause, the conjugated part goes in the normal verb position, and the prefix moves to the end:
De arts schreef pillen voor. = The doctor prescribed pills.
So in your sentence:
- schreef = the past tense verb
- voor = the separated prefix belonging to voorschrijven
This is very common in Dutch with separable verbs, such as:
- opbellen → Ik bel je op.
- aandoen → Hij doet het licht aan.
Why is the sentence not De arts voorschreef pillen?
Because in a normal main clause, Dutch usually puts the finite verb in the second position.
So the basic structure is:
- De arts = subject
- schreef = finite verb in second position
- pillen = object
- voor = separated prefix at the end
That gives:
- De arts schreef pillen voor
If you used voorschreef as one word in a main clause, that would sound wrong in standard Dutch, because separable verbs normally split there.
What does die refer to here?
Die refers to pillen.
So:
- pillen = pills
- die ik moet innemen = that I have to take
This is a relative clause.
Dutch uses die for:
- de-words in the singular
- all plurals
Since pillen is plural, die is the correct relative pronoun.
Compare:
- de man die daar staat = the man who is standing there
- het boek dat ik lees = the book that I am reading
- de pillen die ik moet innemen = the pills that I have to take
Why is it die and not dat?
Because pillen is plural.
A useful rule:
- die = for de-words and plural nouns
- dat = for het-words in the singular
So:
- de pil → de pil die...
- de pillen → de pillen die...
- het medicijn → het medicijn dat...
That is why die is correct in your sentence.
Why is the word order die ik moet innemen and not die ik innemen moet?
Because in modern standard Dutch, when you have a subordinate clause with a modal verb plus another verb, the usual order is:
- subject + modal + infinitive
So:
- die ik moet innemen
Here:
- ik = subject
- moet = modal verb
- innemen = infinitive
You may sometimes see different verb orders in longer clauses, but for learners, ik moet innemen is the normal and safest pattern.
Why is innemen one word here, but separable verbs often split?
Good question. Innemen is also a separable verb:
- innemen = to take, ingest, take in
In a main clause, it can split:
- Ik neem de pillen in.
But after a modal verb like moeten, the second verb stays as an infinitive at the end:
- Ik moet de pillen innemen.
So in your sentence:
- die ik moet innemen
the verb stays together because it is in the infinitive.
Why is there no te before innemen?
Because after a modal verb such as moeten, Dutch uses the bare infinitive, not te + infinitive.
So you say:
Not:
- ik moet te innemen ❌
This is similar to English, where we say I must take rather than I must to take.
What exactly is moet here?
Moet is the singular present tense of moeten.
In this sentence, it means must / have to.
Forms of moeten:
So:
- ik moet innemen = I have to take (them)
Why doesn’t Dutch repeat them after innemen?
Because the object is already understood from pillen.
The relative clause die ik moet innemen literally means:
- that I must take
English often also leaves out them in a relative clause:
- the pills that I have to take
You could think of the object as already built into the relative structure, so Dutch does not need an extra pronoun there.
Is arts the same as dokter?
They are close, but not always identical.
- arts = physician, medical doctor; a more formal or professional term
- dokter = doctor; very common in everyday speech
In many contexts they can both refer to the same person, but arts often sounds a bit more formal or official.
So:
- De arts schreef pillen voor sounds natural and slightly formal.
- De dokter schreef pillen voor is also very natural in everyday Dutch.
Could I also say De arts heeft pillen voorgeschreven die ik moet innemen?
Yes. That is also correct.
It uses the perfect tense:
- heeft voorgeschreven = has prescribed / prescribed
Compare:
De arts schreef pillen voor...
simple past; often used in narration or past contextDe arts heeft pillen voorgeschreven...
perfect tense; very common in spoken Dutch when talking about a past action relevant now
Both are grammatical. The choice depends on style and context.
Is pillen the most natural word here, or could it be medicijnen?
Both are possible, but they are not exactly the same.
- pillen = pills, tablets
- medicijnen = medicines, medication
If the doctor specifically prescribed tablets, pillen is fine.
If you want a broader word, medicijnen works too.
For example:
- De arts schreef medicijnen voor die ik moet innemen.
That sounds natural as well, though innemen especially fits medicine you swallow or ingest.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning DutchMaster Dutch — from De arts schreef pillen voor die ik moet innemen to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions