Ik kom van de supermarkt vandaan.

I come from the supermarket.

Breakdown of Ik kom van de supermarkt vandaan.

• ik: I
• van: from
• komen: to come
• de supermarkt: the supermarket
• vandaan: from

Questions & Answers about Ik kom van de supermarkt vandaan.

Why does this sentence use van and vandaan together?

In Dutch, to express “coming from” a place you use the fixed pattern van X vandaan. The first van links to the specific place (de supermarkt), and vandaan signals movement away from it. Omitting one part breaks the pattern: • Ik kom van de supermarkt sounds incomplete.
• Ik kom vandaan is too vague—you need van + place to specify the origin.

Can I say Ik kom uit de supermarkt instead?

Yes. uit also means “out of” or “from.”
• Ik kom uit de supermarkt is perfectly correct and more concise.
• Both van … vandaan and uit … vandaan work, but in practice uit … alone is very common.

What does vandaan mean on its own?

By itself, vandaan means “away from here” or “from” in a general sense. For example:
• Waar kom je vandaan? – “Where do you come from?”
• Ik kom vandaan. – “I come from (here),” though you normally specify the place afterward.

Why is there a de before supermarkt?

Dutch uses definite articles (de/het) before most singular, specific nouns.
• de supermarkt = “the supermarket.”
If you wanted to be non‐specific, you’d say een supermarkt (“a supermarket”).

Could I omit vandaan and just use van?

No. Ik kom van de supermarkt without vandaan is ungrammatical. You must use van … vandaan or switch to uit ….

What happens if I put vandaan before van de supermarkt?

That reverses the fixed order and becomes incorrect:
• Ik kom vandaan van de supermarkt is wrong.
Always keep van [place] vandaan together after kom.

How would I express the same idea in the past tense?

Replace kom (present) with kwam (imperfect):
• Ik kwam van de supermarkt vandaan.
Or with uit:
• Ik kwam uit de supermarkt.