Bochník položíme na pečicí papír a pečicí kámen.

Položíme is the 1st person plural form of the verb položit.

A few important points:

• položit is a perfective verb
• with perfective verbs, the so-called present form usually has future meaning
• so položíme literally means we will place / we will put down

In recipe style, though, English often translates this more naturally as:

• place the loaf...
• we place the loaf...
• then we place the loaf...

So grammatically it is a future-like form, but in instructions it functions like a recipe step.

Czech recipes very often use 1st person plural for instructions. This is similar to saying:

• now we add...
• then we mix...
• we place the loaf...

It sounds normal and idiomatic in Czech recipe writing.

So instead of commanding the reader directly, Czech often uses a shared instructional we. English recipes usually prefer the imperative:

• Place the loaf on...

But Czech commonly uses:

• Bochník položíme...

Yes, bochník is the direct object, so it is in the accusative case.

But bochník is a masculine inanimate noun, and for many masculine inanimate nouns, the accusative singular looks the same as the nominative singular.

So:

• nominative: bochník
• accusative: bochník

That is why you do not see any ending change here.

Bochník means a loaf, especially a whole formed loaf of bread.

In baking contexts, it often suggests:

• a shaped loaf
• a round or oval loaf
• the finished dough after shaping, ready to bake

So it is more specific than just bread. It refers to the loaf itself.

Here na means onto / on(to) a surface.

With this meaning of movement toward a surface, na takes the accusative.

So in this sentence:

• na pečicí papír
• a pečicí kámen

both nouns are governed by the same na, and both are in the accusative.

This fits the idea of motion: the loaf is being placed onto the paper and stone.

For the same reason as bochník: both papír and kámen are masculine inanimate singular, and in that pattern the accusative singular is often identical to the nominative singular.

So you get:

• papír → accusative papír
• kámen → accusative kámen

Even though the case is accusative, the form stays the same.

Pečicí means for baking or used for baking.

So:

• pečicí papír = baking paper / parchment paper
• pečicí kámen = baking stone

This adjective describes the purpose of the thing, not an action happening right now.

This is a very common question.

• pečicí = used for baking, intended for baking
• pečící = baking in the sense of currently doing the action

So:

• pečicí papír = baking paper
• pečicí kámen = baking stone

But:

• pečící žena = a woman who is baking
• pečící se chléb = bread that is baking

In your sentence, pečicí is correct because the paper and stone are tools used for baking.

Yes, Czech could sometimes omit the second adjective if the meaning is clear:

• na pečicí papír a kámen

But in this sentence, repeating pečicí is clearer and more natural, because it makes it explicit that both are baking-related:

• pečicí papír
• pečicí kámen

If you leave it out, kámen might momentarily sound like just a stone rather than specifically a baking stone.

So the repetition helps clarity.

Yes, both are possible.

• Bochník položíme...
• Položíme bochník...

Czech word order is flexible, and the difference is mostly about focus and style.

In a recipe, starting with Bochník can feel natural because it highlights the thing being handled at that step. It is like saying:

• As for the loaf, we place it...

Starting with the verb is also completely normal, but the given version sounds very natural in instructional Czech.

Czech does not use articles like a and the.

So bochník can mean:

• a loaf
• the loaf

The exact meaning depends on context.

In a recipe, the context usually makes it obvious that this means the loaf you have already prepared. English needs an article, but Czech does not.