Breakdown of Djevojčica je preskočila lokvu, ali joj je kabanica svejedno ostala mokra.
Questions & Answers about Djevojčica je preskočila lokvu, ali joj je kabanica svejedno ostala mokra.
Why is djevojčica used here, and what form is it?
Djevojčica means girl (often little girl or young girl).
In this sentence, it is:
- feminine
- singular
- nominative case
It is nominative because it is the subject of the first clause: the girl is the one doing the action of jumping.
The ending -ica is a common noun ending and often gives a slightly smaller or more affectionate sense, so djevojčica is more like little girl than the more general djevojka.
Why does the sentence say je preskočila instead of just preskočila?
Je preskočila is the perfect tense, which is very commonly used in Croatian for past actions.
It is built with:
- the auxiliary verb je = is/has (here functioning as a past-tense helper)
- the past participle preskočila
So:
- je preskočila = jumped / has jumped over
In everyday Croatian, this is the normal way to express a completed past action.
Why is it preskočila and not preskočio or preskočilo?
The form preskočila agrees with the subject djevojčica, which is:
- feminine
- singular
In the Croatian past tense, the participle changes according to the gender and number of the subject:
- masculine singular: preskočio
- feminine singular: preskočila
- neuter singular: preskočilo
Because djevojčica is feminine singular, preskočila is required.
What exactly does preskočila mean, and why that verb?
Preskočila comes from preskočiti, which means to jump over or to leap over.
Here it implies a completed action: she successfully jumped over the puddle.
This verb is perfective, so it naturally focuses on the whole completed event, not the process. That fits this sentence well, because the point is that she did manage to jump over the puddle.
Why is it lokvu and not lokva?
Lokva means puddle.
Here it appears as lokvu because it is the direct object of preskočila. In Croatian, feminine nouns like lokva usually change from -a to -u in the accusative singular:
- nominative: lokva
- accusative: lokvu
So:
- preskočila lokvu = jumped over the puddle
What does ali do in this sentence?
Ali means but.
It connects the two clauses:
- Djevojčica je preskočila lokvu
- ali joj je kabanica svejedno ostala mokra
So the sentence contrasts expectation and reality:
- she jumped over the puddle,
- but her raincoat still ended up wet.
What does joj mean here?
Joj means to her.
It is the dative singular form of the pronoun ona (she).
In this sentence, Croatian uses a structure that is very natural in the language:
- joj je kabanica ostala mokra
Literally, this is something like:
- to her, the raincoat remained wet
Natural English:
- her raincoat still remained wet
- or simply her raincoat still got/stayed wet
So joj marks the person affected or the possessor.
Why does Croatian use joj instead of a possessive like njezina kabanica?
Croatian very often uses the dative possessor instead of an explicit possessive adjective.
So instead of saying:
- njezina kabanica = her raincoat
it is very natural to say:
- joj je kabanica...
This literally looks like:
- to her, the raincoat...
But in meaning it often corresponds to English her raincoat.
Both are possible, but the dative version is common and idiomatic, especially when talking about something belonging to someone and what happened to it.
Why is the word order joj je kabanica and not kabanica joj je?
This is mainly because joj and je are clitics. Croatian clitics usually go in the second position of their clause.
In the clause:
- ali joj je kabanica svejedno ostala mokra
the clitic group joj je comes very early, after the conjunction ali introduces the clause.
That makes the sentence sound natural and standard.
Other word orders can exist in Croatian, especially for emphasis, but joj je kabanica is the expected neutral order here.
Why are there two forms of je in one sentence?
Because the sentence has two clauses, and each clause has its own verb phrase:
- Djevojčica je preskočila lokvu
- ali joj je kabanica svejedno ostala mokra
In both clauses, je is the auxiliary used to form the perfect tense.
So this is not repetition by mistake. Each clause needs its own tense marking.
What does kabanica mean?
Kabanica means raincoat.
It is:
- feminine
- singular
- nominative here
It is nominative because it is the subject of the second clause:
- kabanica ... ostala mokra
= the raincoat remained wet
What does svejedno mean here?
Svejedno here means something like:
- all the same
- anyway
- nevertheless
- still
In this sentence it signals that the result was contrary to what you might expect:
- she jumped over the puddle,
- but her raincoat still ended up wet anyway
So svejedno adds the idea of despite that.
Why is it ostala mokra?
This is the verb ostati plus an adjective:
- ostala = remained / stayed / ended up
- mokra = wet
Together:
- ostala mokra = remained wet / stayed wet
Both words are feminine singular because they agree with kabanica:
- kabanica = feminine singular
- ostala = feminine singular
- mokra = feminine singular
This agreement is very important in Croatian.
What is the difference between ostala mokra and just bila mokra?
Yes, there is a difference.
- bila mokra = was wet
- ostala mokra = remained wet / stayed wet / ended up wet
Ostala mokra emphasizes the resulting state after something happened. It fits the meaning well here, because the sentence contrasts expectation and outcome:
- she avoided the puddle,
- but the raincoat still ended up wet.
So ostala mokra is more expressive and more precise than simply bila mokra.
Why is mokra feminine?
Because it describes kabanica, and adjectives in Croatian agree with the noun they describe in:
Since kabanica is:
- feminine
- singular
- nominative
the adjective must also be:
- feminine
- singular
- nominative
So:
- masculine: mokar
- feminine: mokra
- neuter: mokro
Is lokvu definite or indefinite? Does Croatian mark the puddle vs a puddle here?
Croatian does not usually have articles like English a and the.
So lokvu can mean:
- a puddle
- the puddle
The exact meaning depends on context.
In this sentence alone, English could translate it either way, depending on the situation. Croatian leaves that unstated unless something else in the context makes it clear.
Could the sentence be translated literally word for word?
Only partly. A very literal version would be something like:
- The little girl has jumped over the puddle, but to her the raincoat all the same remained wet.
That is not natural English, but it helps show the structure.
A natural English translation would be more like:
- The girl jumped over the puddle, but her raincoat still ended up wet anyway.
- or The girl jumped over the puddle, but her raincoat still stayed wet.
So the Croatian structure and the English structure do not match word for word, especially with joj and svejedno.
How is djevojčica pronounced?
A rough pronunciation guide is:
- djevojčica ≈ dyeh-VOY-chee-tsa
A few details:
- dj is a soft sound, somewhat like the beginning of during in some English accents
- j is pronounced like English y
- č sounds like ch in church
- c sounds like ts
So the word is not pronounced the way an English speaker might guess from spelling alone.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning CroatianMaster Croatian — from Djevojčica je preskočila lokvu, ali joj je kabanica svejedno ostala mokra to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions