Breakdown of Jutros sam bila pospana, pa sam zaboravila kišobran.
Questions & Answers about Jutros sam bila pospana, pa sam zaboravila kišobran.
Why is sam used twice in Jutros sam bila pospana, pa sam zaboravila kišobran?
Because there are really two separate verb phrases in the sentence:
- sam bila pospana = I was sleepy
- sam zaboravila kišobran = I forgot the umbrella
In Croatian, the auxiliary sam is used to form both:
- the past tense: sam zaboravila
- the past form of to be with an adjective: sam bila pospana
So each clause needs its own sam.
Why do bila, pospana, and zaboravila all end in -a?
Those forms show that the speaker is female.
In Croatian, some past-tense forms and adjectives agree with the speaker’s gender:
- bila = feminine singular of bio / bila / bilo
- pospana = feminine singular adjective
- zaboravila = feminine singular past participle
A male speaker would say:
- Jutros sam bio pospan, pa sam zaboravio kišobran.
So this sentence specifically sounds like it was said by a woman.
What exactly does jutros mean?
Jutros means this morning or earlier this morning.
It refers to the morning of today, not mornings in general.
Compare:
- jutros = this morning
- ujutro = in the morning
- svako jutro = every morning
So Jutros sam bila pospana means something like I was sleepy this morning.
What does pa mean here?
Here pa means something like:
- so
- and so
- then
- which is why
It connects the two ideas:
- I was sleepy this morning,
- so I forgot my umbrella.
It is very common in everyday Croatian and often sounds more natural than a very direct equivalent of English therefore.
Why is kišobran just kišobran? Shouldn’t there be a word for the or my umbrella?
Croatian normally does not use articles like a or the.
So kišobran can mean:
- an umbrella
- the umbrella
- sometimes even my umbrella, depending on context
In this sentence, context makes it clear that the person forgot their umbrella, even though Croatian does not have to say my.
If you wanted to make it explicit, you could say:
- zaboravila sam svoj kišobran = I forgot my umbrella
But very often that is unnecessary.
What case is kišobran in?
It is in the accusative singular, because it is the direct object of zaboravila.
The verb zaboraviti takes a direct object:
- zaboraviti što? = to forget what?
For masculine inanimate nouns like kišobran, the accusative singular looks the same as the nominative singular:
- nominative: kišobran
- accusative: kišobran
So even though the form does not change, its function in the sentence is accusative.
Why is it zaboravila and not some longer form like zaboravljala?
Zaboravila comes from zaboraviti, which is a perfective verb. It describes a completed event: the forgetting happened.
That fits this sentence well:
- she was sleepy,
- and as a result, she forgot the umbrella.
Zaboravljala would come from the imperfective verb zaboravljati, which usually suggests repeated, habitual, or ongoing forgetting. That would not fit as naturally here.
So:
- zaboravila = forgot (one completed act)
- zaboravljala = was forgetting / used to forget / kept forgetting, depending on context
Why is the word order Jutros sam bila pospana, pa sam zaboravila kišobran? Could it be arranged differently?
Yes, Croatian word order is fairly flexible, but this version is very natural.
A few things are happening:
- Jutros is placed first to set the time.
- sam is a clitic, so it tends to appear near the beginning of its clause.
- The sentence flows from cause to result:
- I was sleepy
- so I forgot the umbrella
You may also see:
- Bila sam jutros pospana, pa sam zaboravila kišobran.
- Jutros sam bila pospana pa sam zaboravila kišobran.
These are all understandable, but the original sounds very natural.
Why do we say bila pospana instead of just using a verb meaning to sleep?
Because pospana means sleepy / drowsy, not asleep.
So:
- bila pospana = was sleepy
- spavala = was sleeping / slept
These are different ideas.
If you say:
- Jutros sam spavala = I slept this morning / I was sleeping this morning
That does not mean the same thing as:
- Jutros sam bila pospana = I was sleepy this morning
The original sentence is about her state being sleepy, which then led to forgetting the umbrella.
Could a man say this same sentence?
Yes, but the forms would change to masculine:
- Jutros sam bio pospan, pa sam zaboravio kišobran.
Changes:
- bila → bio
- pospana → pospan
- zaboravila → zaboravio
This is a very common feature of Croatian: past tense and adjectives often reflect the speaker’s gender.
Is the comma before pa necessary?
Yes, in standard writing it is normally correct to put a comma before pa when it connects two clauses like this:
- Jutros sam bila pospana, pa sam zaboravila kišobran.
That is because each side has its own verb phrase:
- sam bila
- sam zaboravila
In casual writing, people may sometimes leave it out, but the comma is the standard written form here.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning CroatianMaster Croatian — from Jutros sam bila pospana, pa sam zaboravila kišobran to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions