Log inSign up

Sara je takva osoba da uvijek ponese vodu i maramice.

Sara je takva osoba da uvijek ponese vodu i maramice.
Sara is the kind of person who always brings water and tissues.

Breakdown of Sara je takva osoba da uvijek ponese vodu i maramice.

biti
to be
Sara
Sara
voda
water
i
and
uvijek
always
da
that
osoba
person
takav
such
ponijeti
to bring
maramica
tissue
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Croatian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Croatian now

Questions & Answers about Sara je takva osoba da uvijek ponese vodu i maramice.

Why is there a je in the sentence? Can I drop it?

Je is the present-tense form of the verb biti (to be) for he/she/it. In Croatian, the present forms of biti are usually used (unlike Russian, for example).

  • Sara je takva osoba... = Sara is such a person...
    You generally cannot drop je in normal standard Croatian here.
What does takva osoba mean grammatically? Why takva and not takav?

Takva osoba means such a person / that kind of person.

  • osoba (person) is feminine in Croatian (even when it refers to a man), so the adjective must agree with it:
    • masculine: takav
    • feminine: takva
    • neuter: takvo
      So takva matches the feminine noun osoba.
Why is it takva osoba da...? What is this da doing?

This is a common Croatian pattern: (so) ... that ...

  • takva osoba da uvijek ponese... ≈ the kind of person who always brings... / such a person that she always brings...
    Here da introduces a clause that describes/defines what “such a person” means in practice.
Could I say Sara je takva osoba koja... instead of ... da ...?

Yes, often you can.

  • Sara je takva osoba koja uvijek ponese vodu i maramice. = literally Sara is such a person who always brings...
    Both are understandable and common. The da version can sound a bit more like “so… that…” / “the kind of…”, while koja is a straightforward relative clause (who/that). In many contexts they’re near equivalents.
What does uvijek modify, and where does it usually go?

Uvijek = always. It modifies the verb phrase ponese (brings).
It commonly appears before the verb (as here):

  • uvijek ponese = always brings
    But Croatian word order is flexible, and you may also see ponese uvijek, though it can feel more emphatic or stylistic depending on context.
Why is the verb ponese and not nosi? What’s the difference?

Ponese is typically the perfective partner of nositi (to carry). In this kind of sentence, it often implies taking/bringing something along (e.g., when leaving the house).

  • ponijeti/ponese: to take along / bring (once, as a completed action)
  • nositi/nosi: to carry / to wear / to be carrying (more general or ongoing)
    So uvijek ponese fits the idea: every time she goes somewhere, she makes sure to take water and tissues with her.
What is the infinitive of ponese? How would I look it up?

The infinitive is ponijeti (to take/bring along).
In dictionaries you’ll find it under ponijeti, not ponese.
A common pair is ponijeti (perf.) ↔ nositi (imperf.).

Why is it ponese (present tense) if the meaning is habitual (“always”)?

Croatian often uses the present tense to express habitual actions, especially with adverbs like uvijek (always), često (often), obično (usually).
So uvijek ponese works like English always brings / always takes.

Why are vodu and maramice not in the same case (one looks singular, the other plural)?

They’re both direct objects of ponese, but:

  • vodu is singular accusative of voda (water)—water is typically treated as an uncountable mass noun.
  • maramice is plural accusative of maramica (tissue/handkerchief)—here it means multiple tissues.
    So it’s normal that one object is singular and the other plural.
What case is vodu in, and why?

Vodu is accusative singular because it’s the direct object of the verb ponijeti/ponese (to take/bring).

  • nominative: voda
  • accusative: vodu
What case is maramice in? It looks like it could be nominative plural too.

Maramice here is accusative plural, but for many feminine nouns the nominative plural and accusative plural forms are identical.

  • singular: maramica
  • plural nom/acc: maramice
    You know it’s accusative here because it functions as the object of ponese.
What does maramice mean—tissues or handkerchiefs?

Maramica / maramice can mean tissue(s) (paper tissues) or handkerchief(s) depending on context and region. In a “things you bring along” context, many speakers will interpret it as tissues.

Why isn’t there an article like “a/the” in Croatian?

Croatian has no articles. Definiteness (“a” vs “the”) is inferred from context or expressed with other tools (word order, demonstratives like ta/ova/ona, etc.).
So takva osoba can be interpreted as such a person without an article.

Is Sara declined in Croatian? Should it change form here?

In this sentence Sara is the subject, so it stays in the nominative: Sara.
Croatian does decline most names in other cases, e.g.:

  • genitive: Sare (without Sara’s…)
  • dative: Sari (to Sara)
  • accusative: Saru (I see Sara)
    But here nominative is correct.
Could I say Sara je osoba koja... without takva? What changes?

Yes: Sara je osoba koja uvijek ponese vodu i maramice.
That would mean more neutrally Sara is a person who always brings water and tissues.
Adding takva emphasizes the characterization: She’s that kind of person (who does this)—it highlights it as a typical trait.

What does the structure da + present mean here—purpose or result?

Here it’s not purpose (so that) but a descriptive/result-like construction after takav/takva/takvo:

  • takva ... da ... = so/kind-of ... that ...
    It’s describing Sara’s type/character trait rather than stating a goal.
Can I move i or omit it? Does it matter?

I means and and links the two objects: vodu i maramice. You generally keep it.
You could omit the second object or restructure, but if you want both items, i is the normal connector.