Breakdown of Si l'acteur n'était pas arrogant, le réalisateur ne l'aurait pas remplacé.
être
to be
avoir
to have
ne
not (used before the verb)
pas
not (used after the verb)
Questions & Answers about Si l'acteur n'était pas arrogant, le réalisateur ne l'aurait pas remplacé.
Why do we use the Imparfait (n'était pas) in the si clause instead of the Plus-que-parfait (n'avait pas été)?
We use a mixed conditional here to show how an ongoing, present state affects a past event. By using the Imparfait (n'était pas), the sentence implies the actor is still an arrogant person in general. If we used the Plus-que-parfait (s'il n'avait pas été arrogant), it would mean he was only arrogant at that specific moment in the past ('If he hadn't been arrogant...').
In the second half, how do we know the correct order for the negative words and the pronoun l'?
In compound tenses like the Conditionnel Passé, the direct object pronoun (l') must go immediately before the conjugated auxiliary verb (aurait). The negative structure ne ... pas then 'hugs' that entire pronoun-auxiliary block. That gives us ne l'aurait pas followed by the past participle (remplacé).
If this sentence were about an actress (l'actrice), would the spelling of remplacé change?
Yes, it would become remplacée (adding an -e). In French, when you use a compound tense with the auxiliary avoir, the past participle must agree with the direct object if that object comes before the verb. Here, l' is the direct object. Since it comes before aurait, the past participle needs to agree with the noun it replaces.
Why is the word réalisateur used here for 'director' instead of directeur?