Je suis émerveillé qu'ils aient remporté le match.

Questions & Answers about Je suis émerveillé qu'ils aient remporté le match.

Why is aient remporté in the subjonctif passé (past subjunctive) instead of the regular present subjunctive?
The past subjunctive is used here because the action of winning the match happened before the speaker's feeling of amazement. Since Je suis émerveillé que triggers the subjunctive, we need a past tense version of the subjunctive to show this timeline (anteriority).
Since the winning happened in the past, why can't I just use the passé composé (qu'ils ont remporté)?
Expressions of emotion—like être émerveillé que (to be amazed that)—always force the following verb into the subjunctive mood. The passé composé is part of the indicative mood (used for objective facts), so it is grammatically incorrect after this trigger, even though English just uses the simple past "won".
What is the difference between using remporter and gagner for winning a match?
Both mean "to win", and you could absolutely say qu'ils aient gagné le match. However, remporter (literally "to carry back") emphasizes claiming a victory, a prize, or a title. It sounds a bit more triumphant, which pairs nicely with a strong word like émerveillé.
How does émerveillé compare to other words for "surprised", like surpris or étonné?
Émerveillé is a much stronger, inherently positive emotion. It translates closer to "amazed," "filled with wonder," or "spellbound" (notice the root word merveille, meaning marvel/wonder). Surpris (surprised) and étonné (astonished/stunned) can be positive, negative, or neutral depending on the context.

Learn Je suis émerveillé qu'ils aient remporté le match and more in French

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free