Breakdown of Je suis émerveillé qu'ils aient remporté le match.
je
I
être
to be
ils
they (masculine/mixed)
avoir
to have
Questions & Answers about Je suis émerveillé qu'ils aient remporté le match.
Why is aient remporté in the subjonctif passé (past subjunctive) instead of the regular present subjunctive?
The past subjunctive is used here because the action of winning the match happened before the speaker's feeling of amazement. Since Je suis émerveillé que triggers the subjunctive, we need a past tense version of the subjunctive to show this timeline (anteriority).
Since the winning happened in the past, why can't I just use the passé composé (qu'ils ont remporté)?
Expressions of emotion—like être émerveillé que (to be amazed that)—always force the following verb into the subjunctive mood. The passé composé is part of the indicative mood (used for objective facts), so it is grammatically incorrect after this trigger, even though English just uses the simple past "won".
What is the difference between using remporter and gagner for winning a match?
How does émerveillé compare to other words for "surprised", like surpris or étonné?