Nous n'avons que trois composants, c'est pourquoi l'entrepôt est vide.

Questions & Answers about Nous n'avons que trois composants, c'est pourquoi l'entrepôt est vide.

How does c'est pourquoi work in this sentence?
C'est pourquoi is a consequence connector that literally translates to "it is why" or "that is why." It links a cause (Nous n'avons que trois composants) directly to its logical result (l'entrepôt est vide). It is slightly more emphatic than simply saying donc (so/therefore), because it specifically points back to the reason.
Could I use par conséquent instead of c'est pourquoi here?
Yes, you could say ... composants, par conséquent l'entrepôt est vide. Both express a consequence, but c'est pourquoi is often preferred in everyday speech when you want to say "that is why." Par conséquent translates closer to "consequently" or "as a result" and sounds slightly more formal.
Why is there a n' before avons but no pas?
This sentence uses the structure ne ... que, which means "only" rather than being a true negative. Nous n'avons que trois composants means "We only have three components." If you wanted to make it a standard negative statement ("We don't have three components"), you would use Nous n'avons pas trois composants.
What is an entrepôt? Is it related to an enterprise?
No, they are different! Un entrepôt specifically means "a warehouse" or "a storage facility." It is related to the verb entreposer, which means "to store." In this sentence, the lack of components directly explains why this storage building is vide (empty).

Learn Nous n'avons que trois composants, c'est pourquoi l'entrepôt est vide and more in French

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free