Breakdown of Me pidämme heistä molemmista, koska he ovat valppaita.
olla
to be
me
we
he
they
koska
because
pitää
to like
molemmat
both (of them)
valpas
vigilant
Questions & Answers about Me pidämme heistä molemmista, koska he ovat valppaita.
Why do both "heistä" and "molemmista" have the -sta/-stä ending?
In Finnish, when a personal pronoun is paired with a quantifier like molemmat (both) or kaikki (all), both words must inflect in the same case. Because the verb in this sentence requires the elative case (-sta/-stä), both he and molemmat agree and become heistä molemmista.
Just to refresh my memory, why is the elative case used here instead of an object case like the partitive?
The verb pitää requires its target to be in the elative case (-sta/-stä) when it means "to like." If you used a different case or structure, the verb would mean something entirely different (for example, pitää + infinitive means "to have to").
Why is "valppaita" in the partitive plural instead of the nominative plural?
In a predicative sentence (A is B), when the subject is plural (like he, they), the describing adjective must be in the partitive plural. If you used the nominative plural (valppaat), it would sound restrictive, similar to saying "They are the vigilant ones" rather than simply "They are vigilant."
What is the dictionary form of "valppaita", and why does the spelling change so much?
The dictionary form is valpas (vigilant/alert). Words ending in -as/-äs undergo "reverse" consonant gradation when inflecting. The weaker consonant combination -lp- in valpas strengthens to -lpp- in the plural stem (valppai-), before adding the partitive plural ending -ta.
Learn Me pidämme heistä molemmista, koska he ovat valppaita and more in Finnish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free