Breakdown of Hahmot, joita he esittivät, olivat lapsimaisia mutta elokuvamaisia.
olla
to be
mutta
but
he
they
joka
who / which (relative pronoun)
Questions & Answers about Hahmot, joita he esittivät, olivat lapsimaisia mutta elokuvamaisia.
How does the suffix in lapsimaisia and elokuvamaisia change the meaning of the base words?
The suffix -mainen (or -mäinen depending on vowel harmony) attaches to nouns to form adjectives meaning "like a [noun]" or "characteristic of a [noun]". Here, lapsi (child) becomes lapsimainen (child-like), and elokuva (movie) becomes elokuvamainen (cinematic).
What is the difference between using lapsimainen and lapsellinen here?
While both can translate to "childish", lapsellinen typically has a negative, immature connotation (like an adult throwing a tantrum). Lapsimainen simply means having the characteristics of a child (child-like). Since this sentence is about actors performing roles, lapsimainen is the perfect neutral, descriptive choice.
Why are the adjectives lapsimaisia and elokuvamaisia in the partitive plural instead of the nominative plural?
They are predicative adjectives describing the plural subject hahmot (characters). When describing the general qualities of a plural subject, Finnish uses the partitive plural. Using the nominative plural (lapsimaiset) would sound more definitive and specific, translating closer to "they were the childish ones."
Why is the relative pronoun joita in the partitive case?