Breakdown of Saitko uuden reiän poratuksi ja vanhan ruuvin irrotetuksi?
ja
and
vanha
old
uusi
new
reikä
hole
Questions & Answers about Saitko uuden reiän poratuksi ja vanhan ruuvin irrotetuksi?
Why do poratuksi and irrotetuksi end in -ksi instead of just being normal passive participles?
This is the core of the saada + translative participle construction. It expresses successfully getting a task done. The translative ending -ksi marks the final state the object was brought into (the state of being drilled and removed).
Why are the objects uuden reiän and vanhan ruuvin in the genitive case?
They are the total objects of the active verb saada (to get/manage). Because the sentence talks about completely finishing these actions (drilling a whole hole, removing the whole screw), the object takes the genitive-like accusative case.
How does the word poratuksi get its single t if the passive participle of porata is porattu?
Adding the translative ending -ksi closes the final syllable (-tuk-si). In Finnish, a closed syllable usually triggers consonant gradation. So, the strong double tt in the passive participle porattu weakens to a single t, giving us poratuksi.
What about irrotetuksi? How does the consonant gradation work for the verb irrottaa here?