Minä muistan ne vuodet, joina ihmisillä ei ollut äänioikeutta.

Questions & Answers about Minä muistan ne vuodet, joina ihmisillä ei ollut äänioikeutta.

Why is the relative pronoun joina used here instead of a form like joissa?
joina is the essive plural form of the relative pronoun joka. It refers back to the plural word vuodet (the years). The essive case (which uses the -na ending) is used for expressions of time to mean 'during a time' or 'on a given day', just like in tänä vuonna (this year) or perjantaina (on Friday).
Why is vuodet in its basic plural form rather than the partitive case?
The verb muistaa (to remember) takes a total object when you remember specific, complete things. Because you are remembering a specific, defined set of years, ne vuodet takes the regular plural ending -t instead of being in the partitive case.
Why is the verb ei ollut in the singular when the possessor ihmisillä (people) is plural?
In Finnish 'to have' structures, the verb olla is always in the third-person singular, regardless of whether the owner or the thing owned is plural. The literal structure is 'On the people did not be', so the verb remains singular as ei ollut.
Why is äänioikeutta in the partitive case?
This is the object of a negative sentence. Whenever a sentence is negative (in this case, people did not have something), the object must be in the partitive case. Therefore, the basic word äänioikeus (right to vote) takes the partitive ending to become äänioikeutta.

Learn Minä muistan ne vuodet, joina ihmisillä ei ollut äänioikeutta and more in Finnish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free