Question 1

The English translation says "the absence continued", so why is jatkuu in the present tense?

Accepted Answer

This is the core of how Finnish reported speech works. English uses a "sequence of tenses" and shifts the reported verb to the past tense to match "told" (kertoi). Finnish keeps the original tense that the boss actually used. Since the boss originally said "The absence continues" (Poissaolo jatkuu), the reported speech keeps it in the present tense.

Question 2

Why is on used instead of a conditional form like the English "would be"?

Accepted Answer

This is another example of Finnish keeping the original tense in reported speech. The boss's original statement was "I am present tomorrow" (using the present tense for a future action). Therefore, Finnish uses the present tense on in the reported sentence, whereas English backshifts it to "would be" to match the past tense of the main verb.

Question 3

The boss originally would have said "I am present". Why does the sentence use hän on instead of minä olen?

Accepted Answer

While Finnish keeps the original tense in reported speech, it does change the pronoun to match the perspective of the speaker recounting the story. Just like in English, "I" changes to "he" or "she" (hän), and the verb conjugates to match the third person (on instead of olen).

Question 4

What is the literal makeup of the words poissaolo and läsnä?

Accepted Answer

They are opposites built from location words! Poissaolo means "absence" and is a compound of poissa (away) and olo (being). Läsnä means "present" (in attendance) and comes from an old root for "near" combined with the essive case ending -nä, literally meaning "as near".

Pomo kertoi, että poissaolo jatkuu, mutta hän on läsnä huomenna.

Breakdown of Pomo kertoi, että poissaolo jatkuu, mutta hän on läsnä huomenna.

Questions & Answers about Pomo kertoi, että poissaolo jatkuu, mutta hän on läsnä huomenna.

Learn Pomo kertoi, että poissaolo jatkuu, mutta hän on läsnä huomenna and more in Finnish