Breakdown of Me emme keksi valheita, vaan kerromme totuuden.
me
we
ei
no / not (en, et, ei, emme, ette, eivät)
kertoa
to tell
totuus
truth
vaan
but rather (after a negative)
keksiä
to invent
valhe
lie
Questions & Answers about Me emme keksi valheita, vaan kerromme totuuden.
Why do we use vaan instead of mutta for "but" in this sentence?
While both mean "but," vaan is used specifically after a negative clause to mean "but rather" or "instead." Because the first half of the sentence is negative (emme keksi), and the second half provides the contrasting true alternative, we must use vaan.
Why is the first object (valheita) in the partitive case, but the second object (totuuden) in the genitive-accusative case?
This is a perfect example of how negation changes the object! The first clause is negative (emme keksi), and objects of negative sentences must always be in the partitive case (valheita). The second clause after vaan is affirmative (kerromme), so its complete object takes the normal genitive-looking accusative form (totuuden).
What is the base form of valheita, and how is this partitive plural formed?
The base word is valhe (a lie). For Finnish words ending in -e, you form the plural by taking the stem (which adds an extra -e), adding the plural marker -i-, and finally the partitive ending -ta. This creates valheita.
Do I need to repeat the pronoun me (we) after vaan?
No, you do not. Just like in English, when the subject is the same in both clauses joined by a conjunction, you can leave it out of the second one. The personal ending on the verb kerromme already makes it perfectly clear who is doing the telling.
Learn Me emme keksi valheita, vaan kerromme totuuden and more in Finnish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free