Breakdown of Tiedätkö, saako joukkue pisteen, jos vastaus on väärä?
olla
to be
tietää
to know
vastaus
the answer
saada
to get
Questions & Answers about Tiedätkö, saako joukkue pisteen, jos vastaus on väärä?
Why does the English translation have two "ifs", but Finnish uses -ko for one and jos for the other?
English uses "if" for two different meanings: asking "whether" something happens, and stating a condition. Finnish splits these. The indirect question "whether" is handled by adding the clitic -ko to the verb, making saako. The conditional "if this happens" uses the word jos.
Both verbs tiedätkö and saako have the -ko ending. Are they doing the exact same thing?
They use the same clitic, but for slightly different roles. In tiedätkö (do you know?), -ko makes the main sentence a direct yes/no question. In saako, it creates an indirect question inside the sentence, translating as "if" or "whether".
Why does the verb saako come before the subject joukkue (team)?
When you add the question clitic -ko or -kö to a word, that word must move to the very front of its clause. Since the verb saa gets the clitic here, saako sits right after the comma, before the subject.
Why is the word for "point" written as pisteen instead of the basic form piste?