Question 1

The second half of the sentence uses tasxir-ash kardand. How does the -ash work here?

Accepted Answer

This is an example of attaching a pronominal enclitic directly to the nominal (noun) part of a compound verb. Instead of writing the separate object pronoun and marker (u râ tasxir kardand), Farsi often attaches the enclitic -ash (meaning 'him', 'her', or 'it') to the noun tasxir (possession or conquest). This forms tasxir-ash kardand (literally 'his possession they did').

Question 2

Since -ash can mean 'him', 'her', or 'it', how do we know they possessed the villain and not the mask?

Accepted Answer

Grammatically, -ash could refer to either the villain (šarur) or the mask (neqâb). However, context and vocabulary resolve the ambiguity: the compound verb tasxir kardan (to possess, conquer, or captivate) usually applies to people, territories, or minds, rather than a small inanimate object like a mask. Therefore, it naturally means they possessed him.

Question 3

I usually see šarur translated as the adjective 'evil'. Why is it translated as a noun ('the villain') here?

Accepted Answer

In Farsi, adjectives can frequently function as nouns without needing any extra words, similar to saying 'the wicked' or 'the rich' in English. Because šarur stands alone as the subject performing the action here, it acts as a noun meaning 'the evil person' or 'the villain'.

Question 4

We use râ for the mask (neqâb râ). If -ash acts as the direct object in the second clause, why is there no râ there?

Accepted Answer

The definite object marker râ is only used with independent nouns or pronouns (such as neqâb or u). When you use a pronominal enclitic like -ash to represent the direct object, you drop the râ entirely. The enclitic carries the object meaning all on its own.

شرور نقاب را پنهان کرد، اما تسخیرش کردند.

Breakdown of شرور نقاب را پنهان کرد، اما تسخیرش کردند.

Questions & Answers about شرور نقاب را پنهان کرد، اما تسخیرش کردند.

Learn شرور نقاب را پنهان کرد، اما تسخیرش کردند and more in Farsi