آنچه در ذهن می‌ماند، میراث یک معلم است.

Questions & Answers about آنچه در ذهن می‌ماند، میراث یک معلم است.

The current lesson mentions using آنچه or آنچه که. Why is there no که in this sentence?
Both آنچه (ânche) and آنچه که (ânche ke) mean "that which" or "what". Adding که is entirely optional. آنچه که is slightly more common in spoken or informal Persian, while in formal, written, or poetic Persian—like this sentence—آنچه is frequently used by itself to introduce the clause.
How does the pseudo-cleft structure work grammatically in this specific sentence?
The entire phrase آنچه در ذهن می‌ماند (what stays in the mind) acts as a single noun clause that functions as the subject of the sentence. The comma is often used in writing to visually separate this heavy subject from the predicate میراث یک معلم است (is the legacy of a teacher).
The English translation says "in the mind", but the Farsi just says در ذهن. Why isn't there a suffix to make it definite?
In Farsi, when you refer to abstract concepts or general locations like "the mind", "the heart", or "society" in a universal sense, you don't need a definite marker. You simply use the bare noun. Therefore, در ذهن naturally translates to "in the mind" or "in one's mind".
Where exactly does the Ezafe go in the phrase میراث یک معلم?
The Ezafe attaches to the first noun, making it mirâs-e yek mo'allem. Even though یک (yek) acts as an article/number for معلم (teacher), the Ezafe links the head noun میراث (legacy) directly to the entire noun phrase that possesses it.

Learn آنچه در ذهن می‌ماند، میراث یک معلم است and more in Farsi

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free