او چون از انزوا می‌ترسید، تسلیم هنجارها شد.

Questions & Answers about او چون از انزوا می‌ترسید، تسلیم هنجارها شد.

Why isn't there a preposition like به (to) before هنجارها?
In English, you surrender to something, but in Farsi, the compound verb تسلیم شدن (to surrender) often links to its object using an ezafe instead of a preposition. You will read and hear تسلیمِ هنجارها شد, which structurally acts like 'he became the surrender of the norms.'
Since this lesson covers verbs of compulsion, how would we rewrite this idea to use واداشتن?
You would make the fear the subject and use the pattern واداشتن + direct object + به + Noun. For example: ترس از انزوا او را وادار به تسلیم کرد (Fear of isolation forced him into submission). This shifts the sentence from his passive yielding to the active compulsion of fear.
Why is چون (because) placed after the pronoun او?
In Farsi, subordinating conjunctions like چون or اگر (if) can appear after the subject of their clause. Writing او چون instead of چون او is a stylistic choice that puts slightly more emphasis on the subject, though both word orders are perfectly correct and common.
Why use the past imperfect می‌ترسید instead of the simple past?
The prefix می added to the past stem shows an ongoing state or action in the past. His fear wasn't a single, momentary event; it was a continuous state of mind (he was fearing isolation) that formed the background reason for his eventual surrender.

Learn او چون از انزوا می‌ترسید، تسلیم هنجارها شد and more in Farsi

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free