Questions & Answers about مرد پیر لنگان و نالان در خیابان قدم میزد.
How exactly are the words langân and nâlân formed in this sentence?
They are formed by taking the present stem of a verb and adding the suffix -ân. For langân (limping), the verb is langidan (to limp) and its present stem is lang. Add -ân to get langân. For nâlân (groaning), the verb is nâlidan (to groan) with the present stem nâl, giving us nâlân. This structure creates a present participle that describes an ongoing state or manner.
Are langân and nâlân acting as adjectives or adverbs here?
In this sentence, they are acting as adverbs of manner because they describe how the old man was walking (qadam mi-zad). Although words ending in the -ân suffix can sometimes be used as adjectives to directly describe a noun (like a 'crying baby'), here they describe the action of the verb itself.
Why is the verb qadam mi-zad used instead of just qadam zad?
qadam mi-zad is in the past continuous tense, which is formed by adding the prefix mi- to the past stem (zad). It shows that the action was ongoing in the past ('was walking'). If it were qadam zad (past simple), it would mean he 'walked' as a completed, single event, which doesn't fit as naturally with the ongoing nature of his limping and groaning.
Could I place langân va nâlân somewhere else in the sentence?