Question 1

Why does the if-clause use می‌کرد (past continuous) instead of just the simple past?

Accepted Answer

As we are learning in this lesson, Farsi second conditionals (unreal or imaginary situations) often use the Past Continuous tense in the اگر (if) clause. So حمله می‌کرد literally looks like 'was attacking', but here it functions as 'attacked' or 'were to attack'.

Question 2

How does Farsi translate 'would save' in this sentence? Is there a specific word for 'would'?

Accepted Answer

Farsi does not use a separate word for 'would' in conditional sentences. Instead, the result clause simply uses the Past Continuous tense. The verb نجات دادن (to save) becomes نجات می‌دادم (I would save) by adding the continuous prefix می to the regular past tense form.

Question 3

Why is the direct object marker را placed after مردم instead of directly after جان (life)?

Accepted Answer

The phrase جان مردم (lives of people) is linked by a hidden Ezafe vowel, making it a single connected noun phrase. When a direct object is made up of multiple words linked by Ezafe, the marker را must always go at the very end of the entire phrase, never in the middle.

Question 4

Why does the prefix می appear in the middle of the verbs حمله می‌کرد and نجات می‌دادم?

Accepted Answer

These are both compound verbs, made of a noun plus a helper verb: حمله کردن (to attack) and نجات دادن (to save). When adding the prefix می to a compound verb, you always attach it to the helper verb part (کرد and دادم), leaving the first part untouched.

اگر بیگانه با سلاح حمله می‌کرد، جان مردم را نجات می‌دادم.

Breakdown of اگر بیگانه با سلاح حمله می‌کرد، جان مردم را نجات می‌دادم.

Questions & Answers about اگر بیگانه با سلاح حمله می‌کرد، جان مردم را نجات می‌دادم.

Learn اگر بیگانه با سلاح حمله می‌کرد، جان مردم را نجات می‌دادم and more in Farsi