Moet elke take door de producent bekeken worden?

Questions & Answers about Moet elke take door de producent bekeken worden?

Why do we use worden in this sentence instead of zijn?
Because this sentence describes an action that still needs to take place: the producer actually sitting down to watch the takes. This is a dynamic obligation. If you used zijn (Moet elke take door de producent bekeken zijn?), it would change into a stative necessity, meaning 'Must every take already have been viewed?' which focuses on the finished result.
Why are bekeken and worden placed together at the very end of the sentence?
In a yes/no question, the conjugated verb (moet) comes first. All other verbs in the sentence—here, the past participle bekeken and the passive auxiliary worden—are pushed to the very end of the clause. In passive sentences with a modal verb, the past participle almost always sits right before the infinitive.
Is take an English loanword, and why do we use elke instead of elk?
Yes, take is borrowed directly from English for use in the film and television industry. Because the vast majority of English loanwords in Dutch are de-words (de take), the word elk (each/every) must get an -e ending, making it elke take.
Can I put the phrase door de producent at the very end of the sentence, like in English?
No. While English puts 'by the producer' after the verbs, Dutch requires the agent of the action (door de producent) to come before the final verb cluster (bekeken worden). Putting it at the very end of the sentence is grammatically incorrect in Dutch.

Learn Moet elke take door de producent bekeken worden and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free