Question 1

Why does this sentence use me tegen de enkel instead of tegen mijn enkel?

Accepted Answer

This is the possessive shift taught in this lesson. When an action happens to someone's body part, Dutch frequently avoids the possessive pronoun (mijn enkel). Instead, the person becomes the object of the verb (me), and the body part takes a definite article (de enkel). This structure sounds much more natural to a Dutch speaker than Je schopt tegen mijn enkel.

Question 2

The English translation says 'on the ankle', but the Dutch uses tegen. Why not op?

Accepted Answer

The preposition tegen literally means 'against.' In Dutch, when an action like hitting, bumping, or kicking is directed at a vertical or outward-facing body part (like an ankle, shin, or chest), you do it 'against' that body part. You would use op (on) for more horizontal or flat targets, such as op het hoofd (on the head) or op de rug (on the back).

Question 3

Could I use the stressed pronoun mij here instead of me?

Accepted Answer

Yes, but it changes the nuance. Je schopt me is a neutral statement of fact. If you say Je schopt mij tegen de enkel, you are strongly emphasizing that it is YOU who is receiving the kick, perhaps contrasting yourself with someone else, or expressing indignation ('Hey, you're kicking ME!').

Question 4

If I turn this into a question by asking 'Why are you kicking me on the ankle?', what happens to the verb?

Accepted Answer

If you start the sentence with a question word like waarom (why), the verb and subject invert. The verb moves to the second position, pushing the subject je right after it. As a quick refresher: when je follows the verb as the subject, the verb drops its -t ending. The question becomes: Waarom schop je me tegen de enkel?

Je schopt me tegen de enkel.

Breakdown of Je schopt me tegen de enkel.

Questions & Answers about Je schopt me tegen de enkel.

Learn Je schopt me tegen de enkel and more in Dutch