De schakelaar van de waterkoker was kapot.

Questions & Answers about De schakelaar van de waterkoker was kapot.

Why does schakelaar take the -aar suffix instead of the standard -er?
The noun comes from the verb schakelen (to switch or shift). When a verb stem ends in an unstressed -el, -en, or -er, Dutch adds the suffix -aar instead of -er. This rule exists purely for pronunciation; saying schakelaar is much smoother than trying to say "schakeler".
Waterkoker uses the -er suffix. How exactly is this word constructed?
It is a compound noun made of water + koker. The noun koker is derived from the verb koken (to boil) plus the standard -er suffix. So, just as a bakker is someone who bakes, a waterkoker is literally a "water boiler".
Both schakelaar and waterkoker refer to objects here, not people. Is this a common use of these suffixes?
Yes, absolutely! While you usually first learn -er, -aar, and -der as suffixes for people who do an action (agent nouns, like schrijver for writer), they are equally common for instruments or tools that perform an action (instrument nouns). A switch is an object that "switches" and a kettle is an object that "boils".
Why is kapot used here instead of gebroken for "broken"?
In Dutch, kapot is used for machines, electronics, or mechanisms that no longer function properly, like a switch or a kettle. You use gebroken when something is physically snapped or shattered into pieces, like a bone, a glass, or a heart.

Learn De schakelaar van de waterkoker was kapot and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free