Learn Dutch: Als je geïsoleerd raakt, raak je ook vaak ontmoedigd. - If you get isolated, you also often get discouraged.

Using worden would create a standard passive sentence, implying someone or something is actively doing the isolating to you. Using raken focuses purely on the change of state (getting into that condition), usually happening gradually or out of your control. This perfectly fits the psychological states of being isolated and discouraged.

Why is the word order raak je in the second half of the sentence, instead of je raakt?

The first part of the sentence (Als je geïsoleerd raakt) is a subordinate clause that takes up the entire first position of the main sentence. Because Dutch strictly follows the "verb-second" rule in main clauses, the main verb (raak) must come right after the comma, swapping places with the subject (je).

How do we know whether to end geïsoleerd and ontmoedigd with a -d or a -t?

These are past participles acting as adjectives, so they follow the standard 't kofschip rule. The stem of isoleren ends in r, and the stem of ontmoedigen ends in g. Since neither r nor g are consonants in 't kofschip, the past participles end in a -d.

Can I use raken for any change of state, like "getting rich"?