De koningin, wier dynastie oud is, bezoekt het kasteel.

Questions & Answers about De koningin, wier dynastie oud is, bezoekt het kasteel.

Why do we use wier here instead of wiens?
Wier is the formal word for "whose" when referring back to a feminine or plural noun. Because de koningin (the queen) is feminine, we must use wier. If the sentence were about a king (de koning, masculine), you would use wiens.
Would I use wier in an everyday conversation?
Probably not. While you might occasionally hear wiens in speech, wier is almost exclusively used in formal written Dutch. In casual conversation, native speakers typically use the phrase van wie instead: De koningin, van wie de dynastie oud is...
Why is the verb is pushed to the end of the middle section?
The phrase wier dynastie oud is is a relative clause, which follows the same word order rules as a subordinate clause. In Dutch subordinate clauses, the conjugated verb is pushed to the very end of the clause.
Why does bezoekt immediately follow the comma? Doesn't the verb need a subject right next to it?
The subject is already there at the beginning: De koningin. The core sentence is simply De koningin bezoekt het kasteel. The relative clause just temporarily interrupts it. Once the relative clause ends at the comma, the main clause picks up exactly where it left off, placing the verb bezoekt in its normal second position.

Learn De koningin, wier dynastie oud is, bezoekt het kasteel and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free