De broek is te wijd om te dragen.

Questions & Answers about De broek is te wijd om te dragen.

Why is broek singular when the English translation says "trousers"?
In Dutch, an item of clothing for the legs is seen as a single object, so broek is singular. It takes the singular verb is. English treats words like "trousers" or "pants" as plural, but Dutch does not.
Why do we use om te instead of just te dragen?
The combination te [adjective] om te [infinitive] is the standard Dutch pattern for saying something is "too [adjective] to [do something]". Here, om te connects the description (te wijd) to the action (dragen).
Does wijd just mean "wide"?
It literally means "wide", but when talking about clothing, wijd is the standard word for "loose" or "baggy". The opposite would be strak (tight).
How would I say this if I meant multiple pairs of trousers?
You would use the plural noun and verb: De broeken zijn te wijd om te dragen. Remember that one pair of pants is always just de broek.

Learn De broek is te wijd om te dragen and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free