Breakdown of Namens de regering moest de fabriek worden gesloten.
moeten
to have to, must
sluiten
to close
worden
to become
de fabriek
the factory
Questions & Answers about Namens de regering moest de fabriek worden gesloten.
How do we form the simple past passive with a modal verb in this sentence?
We use the simple past of the modal verb moeten (moest) in the second position of the sentence. The actual passive action goes at the very end, using the infinitive worden (to be) and the past participle gesloten (closed). Together, moest ... worden gesloten translates to had to be closed.
Why is the subject de fabriek placed after the verb moest?
The sentence starts with the prepositional phrase Namens de regering (On behalf of the government). Because Dutch uses verb-second (V2) word order in main clauses, the finite verb (moest) must take the second position. The subject (de fabriek) is therefore inverted and pushed to the third position, right after the verb.
Is it possible to change the order of worden and gesloten at the end of the sentence?
Yes! When a clause has an infinitive like worden and a past participle like gesloten at the end, Dutch allows you to place them in either order. Both worden gesloten and gesloten worden are completely correct and common.
Could I just use voor instead of namens to mean on behalf of?