Questions & Answers about Hektarlarca ormanın yanışı bizi çok üzdü.
What exactly does the -ca suffix add to hektarlarca?
In this lesson's context, adding -cE / -çA to a plural noun expresses an extensive, exaggerated quantity. hektarlarca means "hectares and hectares of" or "countless hectares of." While you could just use a word like birçok (many), hektarlarca carries much more emotional weight and emphasizes the massive scale of the disaster.
Why did we use the -ış verbal noun in yanışı instead of the -ma verbal noun (yanması)?
Both ormanın yanışı and ormanın yanması mean "the burning of the forest" and are mostly interchangeable here. However, the -ış suffix (which forms an action or "manner" noun) often emphasizes the visual process, spectacle, or the specific unfolding of the event. It subtly highlights the tragedy of watching the event happen, whereas -ma is slightly more factual.
English uses "burning" for both being on fire and setting something on fire. Which one is yanışı here?
yanışı comes from yanmak, which is strictly intransitive (to be on fire / to undergo burning). It describes the forest going up in flames. If you wanted to say the act of setting the forest on fire, you would need the transitive verb yakmak, which would make the verbal noun yakışı.